But.... But.... But....
Oops. I meant, butt with two t's.
Sounds like Samuel Huntington's premise about "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order" is being demonstrated rather clearly now.
Seems like the gay-tranny-cocaine Biden administration isn't exactly leading that "liberal world order," after all.
“Sexual deviancy” is quite apropos as it covers all the perversity in a single term.
Personally, I use it most of the time.
It’s policies like this that invite another America incursion. Rally round the Iraqi perverts!
“sexual deviance” or “sexually inadequate” or “sexually confused” or “gender confused”, would be good terms to replace “LGTBQ+”.
This is not going to go well for them. Nothing angers the Power as much as showing disrespect toward the Others.
Hmmm, din’t we substitute gay for homosexual years ago. Not comparing us to that sorry assed country, but it seems like certain minded folks love to m-bate on language. There is nothing demeaning about the word homosexual - it states a truth.
The GloboHomo’s miscalculated. Once they went after the children, it was a bridge to far to cross. The degenerate puppet masters cannot turn it around now.
I expect them to initiate World War III soon, to change the attention they are getting.
So, then, Iraq was a country worth saving after all.
Whooda thunk.
/s
I had to chuckle at the hypocritical pronouncement from the Iraqi Brotherhood of Goat Breeders. Next, they will require the female goats to wear burkas.
I starting to suspect that the Antichrist will be an Islamic Conservative that claims to protect children from Predators
I prefer “sexual perversion” myself, but “deviance” works as well.
Here's a quote from a homo-activist of the era admitting as much:
"It was never a medical decision—and that’s why I think the action came so fast…It was a political move…That’s how far we’ve come in ten years. Now we even have the American Psychiatric Association running scared."
-Barbara Gittings, Activist