MacGregor is a poor source of analysis because he has been consistently wrong. If he had been right at some points he would get more respect.
Igor Girkin has in contrast often been correct, notably on the matter of Kherson and the state of the Donets militia, etc. His take was often perceptive, in spite of his being as anti Ukraine as its possible to be. Its a case of a bad guy being a useful source.
RU is similar to MacGregor. Moreover they are on the wrong side. They are the bad guys. Hear them, but consider the nature of the source and their track record.
Monetized channels are the entire worlds media. If you reject it all outright on that basis then you might as well live in a cave.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Update from Ukraine | Bridges Kaboom | Ruzzian Logistics Nightmare | Ukraine Strikes again, buwaya wrote: |
MacGregor is a poor source of analysis because he has been consistently wrong. If he had been right at some points he would get more respect. MacGregor is a fantastic source of analysis due to his training and experience. He's been right but is constantly attacked as if he is less accurate than CIA operative Denys Davydov because he's destroying Biden's 'narrative' - the Deep State has so much invested in the Ukraine that any who point out the truth, like MacGregor, are targeted for cancellation. Igor Girkin has in contrast often been correct, notably on the matter of Kherson and the state of the Donets militia, etc. His take was often perceptive, in spite of his being as anti Ukraine as its possible to be. Its a case of a bad guy being a useful source. RU is similar to MacGregor. Moreover they are on the wrong side. They are the bad guys. Hear them, but consider the nature of the source and their track record. The whole 'narrative' relies on liars like Denys Davidov to falsely claim that the Ukraine is innocent when it is being used as the hub of extreme levels of evil. Bio warfare labs, bribes, graft, fraud, child trafficking, organ trafficking - so much crime in the Deep State's crime headquarters in the Ukraine, and you're defending the fake narrative that they were innocent people attacked by Russia for no reason. This after Russia went to the UN to request an investigation into the US bio warfare labs in the Ukraine which just happen to be positioned on Russian borders. The Ukraine should have accepted for the request for a UN investigation and shown the world what was there. Ah but they had so much to hide! So they denied the truth and push the narrative of lies. Monetized channels are the entire worlds media. If you reject it all outright on that basis then you might as well live in a cave. What I reject is Ukrainian propaganda threads cranking out around the clock to disseminate video links created fresh around the clock in order to monetize and support the Ukrainian war and propaganda effort. Those on the Ukrainian threads defending Biden's false 'narrative' shriek moral indignation with their claims of 'bias' if anything but Ukrainian propaganda is posted, and offer instead link after monetized link to keep the grift going. The Ukrainian propaganda threads are silent support for the war dressed up as 'discussion'. Don't agree with the war in the Ukraine? Here just watch this video(propaganda) to find out for yourself; we just won't tell you that you're clicking on our monetized Ukrainian propaganda link, and therefore financially supporting the war you don't want to support. That's why these videos are constantly new around the clock - gotta get clicks around the clock to collect money on monetized propaganda around the clock. The hypocrisy of those pushing the pro Ukraine narrative is beyond obvious to those with morals. |