Replies

FTA you posted a link to:

_________________________________________

In the clip-within-the-clip, Saad asked Offit about myocarditis and the jabs, and Dr. Offit made this startling admission (and — of course — it’s baffling):

[Offit:] “There certainly is a causal link between vaccination and myocarditis and pericarditis. No doubt about it. The um … It’s unclear why. It may be, as was actually noticed in 2020, the SAR-Cov-2 virus, the spike protein, mimics one of the proteins on heart muscle cells, specifically the heavy chain of uh, uh, uh . So, If that’s true, while you’re making a immune response to the spike protein, you’re also inadvertently making an immune response to your own heart muscle.”

.....Bret and Heather noted that Offit just made a huge admission: The spike protein is cytotoxic, and jabbing creates a toxic autoimmune response to healthy heart cells. Bret doesn’t think Dr. Offit made this admission on accident or in good faith. Bret said Offit’s admission was a limited hangout, to soften the blow of people finding out there are unanticipated consequences to the heart from the jabs.

[Bret:] “Never let a good crisis go to waste… allowed them to push aside all of the safeguards that should have prevented a prototype technology like this from reaching the market without demonstrating safety. So okay. Pharma accomplished the impossible. They took a product that it owned — that in my opinion was at least three decades out from being usefully and safely deployable, if at all, there’s no telling whether you could have rescued it. It might have taken three decades for them to figure out how to bring it about and then show that it was safe, and they didn’t want to wait.

Now you have a huge fraction of the globe that has already accepted mRNA vaccine technology. how are you gonna rescue it from a 1 in 35 chance of damaging your heart? How are you going to overcome that this stuff is lethally dangerous, and to tissues you can’t afford to have damaged?”

[Heather:] “Blame the spike protein!”

[Bret:] “Right. If the problem is inherent to the spike protein, then okay, we admit it, we picked the wrong protein, but all you gotta do is pick the right protein that doesn’t have some flaw like this, and the mRNA platform is right back on track.

On the other hand, if we are right … if it’s both spike is a bad choice, and it doesn’t matter which protein… Any foreign protein transcribed by your cells is going to cause your own immune system to go after your own heart cells, if that’s where this thing ends up transfecting.”

Gosh. If only someone had warned them the spike protein was a terrible idea to cook into an mRNA injection.

Anyway, if Bret is right, that means Offit was telegraphing a new narrative shift, a shift to Stage 6, to admitting that okay, maybe these jabs are unintentionally dangerous by design, only accidentally, nobody could have seen it coming, but still mRNA in general is a successful platform for vaccines, once you get the spike protein out of the equation.

Gosh. If only someone had warned them the spike protein was a terrible idea to cook into an mRNA injection.

And Weinstein is saying — as we’ve been discussing for two years on C&C — that mRNA is dangerous in general by design because it transfects (infects) healthy cells like heart cells. And then recipients’ immune systems target those formerly-healthy transfected cells for self-destruction. That is called an autoimmunity response, or an injurious immune reaction to self.

It’s almost like injecting people with AIDS or something.

________________________________________________________

This part is worth repeating. BOLO for this narrative shift.

“Offit was telegraphing a new narrative shift, a shift to Stage 6, to admitting that okay, maybe these jabs are unintentionally dangerous by design, only accidentally, nobody could have seen it coming, but still mRNA in general is a successful platform for vaccines, once you get the spike protein out of the equation.”

“Nobody could have seen it coming,” Yeah, right. Except there were some people who could see it coming. They were labeled as antivaxers and removed from social media and were never invited on The View to discuss their concerns.