Then the skeptics here need to behave like adults and offer counter arguments instead of all this squirrel bullshit and attacking individuals such as Rooster.
This is an adult forum and posters need to present their arguments as adults instead of like 12 year old kids looking for attention while the adults are talking.
In the UFO world the “counter arguments” that are not ad hominem attacks boil down to debunking specific sightings or individuals.
If successful the debunker/skeptic has convinced folks that one incident was not correctly reported.
Then they get to deal with thousands of other incidents—rough task—like stomping on ants at a picnic.
They have persuaded me that a couple of the UFO incidents in the literature are mistaken identity—the Kecksburg, PA sighting apparently was a fallen US craft (conventional technology) and Jacques Vallee and others are convinced that the Tic-Tacs are also conventional very advanced secret US tech (at least partially because they are of a type previously unknown in the UFO literature. Any “new” UFO type post 1990 or so is suspect in their view.)