Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

It’s a med that should be OTC, that a doctor has to be involved is completely absurd and anti-Freedom.

These boards are acting in ways that protect Big Pharma, and not in a way that protects the health and safety of the public at large. These are the same medical systems that passed out opioids like M&Ms not that long ago. Where were they, then? Additionally, these same medical structures generally gave a pass on forcing the mRNA experimental treatment on many, in violation of the Nuremberg Codes.

Why do they have any respectability at all?


23 posted on 08/01/2023 7:35:29 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomPoster

There are legitimate questions to be raised about OTC vs. prescription requirements, mandates and legal protections for experimental drugs, etc. Those aren’t directly relevant to the matter of practice standards for a professional who is licensed through a state board. If a doctor really believes that a medication should be available over the counter, then why get involved in prescribing it in the first place?


25 posted on 08/01/2023 7:45:14 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've just pissed in my pants and nobody can do anything about it." -- Major Fambrough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson