Why would there be “personal contact info” in the clerks email? Isnt the clerk a public employee?
Legal Experts Point To Another Fishy Aspect Of Hunter Biden’s Proposed Plea Deal..... that the “statement of facts” included in Hunter Biden’s proposed plea deal favored the defense.....since due to the Biden-controlled DOJ terms, it would have immunized Hunter from prosecution for a number of offenses.
The “statement of facts” points out that Hunter Biden “continued to earn money and exercise control over his personal and corporate finances” even during the 2017-2018 period where his substance abuse worsened and he failed to pay taxes.
“Certainly a significant portion of the Statement of Facts is defense-oriented,” attorney Sol Wisenberg tweeted. “This is not normal.”
Lawyer and former federal prosecutor Bill Shipley said on Twitter that he thinks there is “no way the prosecutors wrote the Statement of Facts.”
“That was written by defense counsel (more likely the WH) because there is a purpose behind it, and it’s written in a style that I have NEVER seen come from a prosecutor,” he said. “It is not something I would have ever written in a million years.”
So they’re lying to the clerk. Bad move. This is a strange case in that both sides are likely doing it because the fix is in.
“Noreika said Latham & Watkins LLP staffer Jessica Bengals represented herself as someone who worked with Theodore Kittila, the attorney for the House Ways & Means Committee in a call to the Clerk’s Office.”
*************
Is there no penalty for doing such a thing???
There seems to be a problem with noreika’sclerk’s office.
First, the second unnamed clerk removed the amicus brief under a miscommunication. This trial is under the national spotlight and a “mistake” like that could sink a case.
Second, the second clerk remains unnamed. Is he or she being protected? Being fired?
Third, the office accepted a statement generated by its own office in a filing. What is so wrong with this? If it is wrong then why was it accepted by the office? There were extenuating circumstances.
All of these problems happened under the control of the clerk’s office.
Does Hunter have a mole in the clerks office?
Apparently in view of how this is proceeding, the court clerk phones are not recorded. It would be nice to get more definitiveness on that point, or did the second staffer call bengels on her personal cell phone?? Using a personal cell phone for official court business which compounds a gross error seems like fraud on the court.
If it hasn’t happened yet, rest assured that this judge will be getting a visit from Bruno, the DC criminal cabal’s messenger, (likely an unidentified DOJ agent hit man).
Hope she gets next SC opening.
I am under the impression that the court has some discretion as to whether or not to accept any given amicus brief for filing. If so discretion may be shared between the presiding judge and the clerk staff. Maybe a real lawyer can comment on this.
I’m surprised the Dhimmicraps haven’t tried to impeach her yet.
“My son has done nothing wrong.”