Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/10/2023 Vol.465, Q Day 2073, Danie_2023 wrote:
“Trump is pursuing a winning strategy which maintains the rule of law, and doesn’t involve Civil War or citizens attacking public figures. He will not set a precedent for the left to use to fake the justification for a future violent uprising.”
And again, when the DS left steals the 2024 election... how far will Trump’s rule of law strategy have gotten us? There comes a time when you have to wake the hell up and smell the reality. Had our forefathers not done that, we’d still be under British rule and would be even further down the Marxist rabbit hole than the UK now is. The time is drawing near and 2025 will be the year to either stand ... or fold.
2A defends the home, the community, the patriot.
Violence from militias gives Biden 'permission' to instill martial law - forever. Think China.
You are ignoring reality and ignoring the points I made that prove violent militias won't work. There are countries right now in South America that can tell you this.
Violent militias unleash the millions of young men of military age who have already flooded across our borders to 'join in the patriotic movement' as false flags. (The majority of people rioting in France are named 'Mohammed.') Then in response to citizen militias, those same illegals become UN 'peace keepers' - all Biden's regime has to do is give them a white helmet and a weapon, the UN will do the rest.
Please address the obvious tactical and strategic problems with your suggestions. Who has better comms, air superiority, training, weapons, armor, armaments, access to medical treatment (without be arrested), identifiable agency (can discern each other as friend or foe), positive MSM coverage, and support of members of the public who will be informed that our police and military are protecting America and citizens from violent enemies, and told to stay in their homes or face arrest/gunfire? Which of the two has the best, most powerful leader - militias or law abiding MAGA?
You say the time is drawing near but our country was already controlled when Trump took office in 2015. At that time most of the country was asleep and trusting our government; there really would have been civil war if he had not acted with marked restraint. Note how he handled it - he never took the bait to send in Gov troops to riots, not without the support of a deeply divided public. MAGA counter protesters were present as were Deep State rioters and Deep State police (e.g., George Floyd riots) - the perfect mix to 'get it going' as the deceived public could not be identified apart from Antifa for their true intent.
We had already gone over the waterfall - the government was fully captured before Trump took office. We don't have to worry that it's coming to our country 'soon'; it's been this way for years.
Prayer, strategy, the sacrificial service of patriot heroes in the military and citizenry, and astonishing fortitude kept us out of the jaws of permanent martial law on many fronts.
The tables have turned after Trump has been educating the public 24/7, and Q has set patriot anons in motion waking others up. The majority now support Trump. He serves the will of the people. The military can see the will of the people and maintain their oath to serve our country if they must act domestically. We the People are directed not to get in the way if the Deep State and patriots in the military contend in the streets.
The support of the public makes all the difference in the world. The bloodiest war the US ever fought was the Civil War. This rule of law strategy is how you take a country back while protecting its future, citizens and prosperity.
The Deep State will act against us even when Trump cleans up the election issue. Our enemies will not give up and go home. We are slated to face attacking enemies whether the vote is fair or not - best to let Americas military handle it. Q said, "The military is the only way."
Our 2nd Amendment rights permit us to defend ourselves so the military can focus on priority threats. I've heard it said that there may be times when first responders and military cannot respond to civilian needs because they will be too busy saving AMerica to break away, and therefore we must be as independent as possible for the anticipated period of conflict.
But the use of the military must be lawful or else some troops will refuse to act in order to remain faithful to their oath to support the constitution, and we could have what amounts to a military civil war. A civil war would establish the precedent of 3rd world dictatorship transfers of power with factions of the military trying to fight for our country but unable to tell which is the 'real' side to be defended. That would result in permanent loss of wealth as the peaceful transfer of power would be replaced by charismatic leaders/MSM propaganda manipulating the public and military, driving them to fight each other until military law is implemented. Study world history - it's all there. Many of us don't realize America could become a true 3rd world country if we attempt to drive our enemies out with civilian violence, and this is true 'normalcy bias.'
The citizen militias without comms/coordination versus the rule of law with the best President the world has ever known and the support of his military? I know which one wins.
The Deep State won't give up. Uncoordinated, untrained, under-equipped, leaderless, lawless militias infiltrated by our enemies are more likely to give up when the first thousand end up in Biden's gulag and displayed as trophies to intimidate the rest. Some of the citizenry will believe the MSM's incessant propaganda that those militias were bought by our enemies to overthrow our country.
Prayers up! God has led us this far and will not abandon us. God wins.
PS: Free Republic does not permit calls for rebellion.
Oh, yeah, and no calls for rebellion or insurrection.
5 posted on 1/24/2021, 11:34:47 AM by Jim Robinson

Great post, MQD, on the fantasy of a 2A citizen uprising a la 1776.

Back then, every citizen could arm themselves equal to the military. Rifles were dismount (if cavalry), one shot...reload.

Even 100 years later, after the advent of Springfield rifles and Colt Revolvers (both new inventions) the citizen was still as well armed as military.

And the military back then, at least until the 1850s or so, could not even defeat the Comanches armed with bows and arrows. (Comanches had military control of the southwest from just west of Fort Worth, Texas almost to southern California.)

There is a role for citizen militias in protecting liberty; and, that would be resistance against foreign invaders. Think BLUE HELMETS.

As you pointed out, a billion unarmed people couldn’t change things in China. I would add that the population of Iraq was as fully armed as Americans, yet had no hope of overthrowing Saddam Hussein without American intervention.

Last point: The need for outside intervention to overthrow tyranny is yet another reason we cannot allow the creation of a world government. (There would be no help...almost no hope...when it became tyrannical as is its clearly demonstrated proclivity.)