I agree entirely.
I don't think you "disclose" an image if you just post a link to where someone else has already posted the image on the interweb. Also, Hunter Biden clearly does not have "a reasonable expectation of privacy" in images that he abandoned at a computer repair shop and that have subsequently been posted all over the interweb.
If the statute can be construed to cover tweeting a link to Hunter Biden's photos, then the statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and must be overturned under the First Amendment.
It sounds like the statute was poorly written, especially if they can twist it and distort it to their pernicious ends like they are doing.
She should have told them to pound sand and stood her ground. You never want to give into the rabid mob.