Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeInPA

I saw “unauthorized possession of” and concluded - there goes their case. He was the president.

I also heard the ‘audio clip’ that’s being hyped. I heard people laughing when he said, this is classified. Secret. I can imagine him waxing hyperbolic on the ridiculousness of most classification, and holding up a menu and saying, ‘This is classified. Secret.” Especially as they now say they don’t have the ‘document’ he was supposedly displaying at the time.


4 posted on 06/28/2023 6:12:14 AM PDT by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: curious7

>I also heard the ‘audio clip’ that’s being hyped. I heard people laughing when he said, this is classified. Secret. I can imagine him waxing hyperbolic on the ridiculousness of most classification, and holding up a menu and saying, ‘This is classified. Secret.” Especially as they now say they don’t have the ‘document’ he was supposedly displaying at the time.<

He was not indicted for possessing classified documents. This audio file would most certainly never be allowed into evidence on it’s own and the snake Smith knows it. This is merely to taint the jury pool.

I would expect in voir dire for the jurors to be asked if they heard any leaked audio of the case.

EC


12 posted on 06/28/2023 6:25:17 AM PDT by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: curious7
"I can imagine him waxing hyperbolic on the ridiculousness of most classification, and holding up a menu and saying, ‘This is classified. Secret."

That's the part that kills me--the irony of him holding up a copy of The New York Times with a front page story of leaked info effectively saying "this is what Jack Smith wants to prosecute me for. Its on the freaking front page of the NYT!"

16 posted on 06/28/2023 6:33:59 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: curious7

“I saw “unauthorized possession of” and concluded - there goes their case. He was the president.”

He wasn’t president at the time they found the documents he is charged with possessing. A former president is not authorized to possess national defense information. It seems to be a common misconception that a president owns his presidential records when he leaves office. While a former president has access to his presidential records after he leaves office, they are owned by and in the custody of the government. All of the presidential records contained in presidential libraries are owned by and managed by the National Archives.


22 posted on 06/28/2023 7:13:48 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson