No one said most do, maybe he is the first that ever did it.
My point is you do not know anything about it. Smarten up.
I do know people do not get charged with “malicious” and that murder means someone took someone else’s life maliciously (in the legal sense) where as manslaughter means in some form of accident.
So you are wrong that I do not know anything and equally wrong for trying to quash someone questioning such language. How exactly have you determined I do not know anything? Since you went there, how do you know enough to tell me what I am allowed to question and how much I know? I guess you think you know something? I suspect you do not even understanding the rhetorical failings with stating a person does not know “anything” when in a debate.
Your point seems to be no one should question oddities and just accept what the government tells you?
You can choose to go NPC and give up critical thinking. I prefer to actually try to challenge those things that are questionable to begin with.