I do know people do not get charged with “malicious” and that murder means someone took someone else’s life maliciously (in the legal sense) where as manslaughter means in some form of accident.
So you are wrong that I do not know anything and equally wrong for trying to quash someone questioning such language. How exactly have you determined I do not know anything? Since you went there, how do you know enough to tell me what I am allowed to question and how much I know? I guess you think you know something? I suspect you do not even understanding the rhetorical failings with stating a person does not know “anything” when in a debate.
Your point seems to be no one should question oddities and just accept what the government tells you?
You can choose to go NPC and give up critical thinking. I prefer to actually try to challenge those things that are questionable to begin with.
You do not know any details or background on the current guy in a bonfire case.