Posted on 06/23/2023 9:20:19 AM PDT by Red Badger
“Mauger added that it would be difficult to locate the bodies because the debris showed that it imploded due to the intense pressure”
I wonder if implosion at this depth and pressure even leaves recognizable bodies for retrieval and burial? Probably aren’t many prior known cases for comparison. RIP.
He probably fused with him, briefly.
Inaudibly bonded with him, he fused with him.
The vessel reportedly “shattered”. Imagine millions of carbon fiber shards, all directed inwards by 6000psi over every square inch of vessel.
They were shredded. Likely nothing left but bits.
Dang. Beat me by about a minute.
Dang you on the fast draw.
Gasping for breath? One theory is the pressure
situation killed them in a millisecond. It wasn’t
a slow tortured death
At least it was a quick death.
Of all of them, I did feel bad for the kid. The others should have known and accepted the risk
But someone should tell that woman the boy didn’t suffer.
In actuality, that is the way to go. You are obliterated before your brain registers anything.
When the USS Scorpion sank in 1968 after a casualty, they think it may have sunk to up to 3000 feet before it reached crush depth.
When it happened, when the hull imploded at crush depth, the entire stern section of the submarine telescoped into the bow of the submarine at 2,000 mph, and the entire submarine was flooded in 0.1 seconds.
They said it telescoped from stern to bow so rapidly and forcefully that it left the entire screw and shaft behind the crushed hull of the submarine.
That boy didn’t suffer.
She was thinking about them suffocating after running out of air. She did not know of the implosion at the time...............
I rather doubt that there are any body parts left.
The good news (if there is any) for this grieving woman is that her nephew didn’t “gasp for breath.” I suspect they were dead before their brains could even process that something bad was happening. When your time is up, going instantaneously is probably the best one can hope for.
I doubt there would be a need for “body recovery” since I wouldn’t think there would be any large body parts to be found.
Also, a good father/son bonding experience would be a week camping at a state park with a little fishing and a bit of canoeing. Evenings could be spent around the camp fire discussing life experiences (which do not involve going to dangerous ocean depths).
I can’t believe a father took his son on such a dangerous excursion.
Is that a movie producer’s 1920s interpretation of Jules Verne?
What would the effect be on the large bones?
If his father was some “60 year-old white guy” and former submariner, he would have probably suggested a camping trip instead.
“I wonder if implosion at this depth and pressure even leaves recognizable bodies for retrieval and burial? Probably aren’t many prior known cases for comparison.”
Probably only enough left for a small fish to nibble at...
I just read an article that said the explosion in the sub would immediately incinerate all the bodies.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65934887
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.