[rdcbn1]

Things are not going in a positive direction in this conflict. Use of nukes was an ominous but very remote possibility a year ago, now it’s a realistic potential outcome.

[desertsolitaire]

Should the US not waste time in stationing some of its own tactical Nukes in Ukraine as a response? Would the operational control over their use be given to Ukraine Military to speed their effectiveness if situations demanded immediate action?
I wonder if we still have the Davey Crockett system, small atomic artillery or mortar devices?

[MeganC]

“Things are not going in a positive direction in this conflict. Use of nukes was an ominous but very remote possibility a year ago, now it’s a realistic potential outcome.”

Nonsense. Putin has issued nuclear threats at everyone opposed to his greedy war of conquest from the very start:

https://www.google.com/search?q=russia+putin+nuclear+weapons&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2022%2Ccd_max%3A3%2F1%2F2022&tbm=

[libertylover]

Things are not going in a positive direction in this conflict. Use of nukes was an ominous but very remote possibility a year ago, now it’s a realistic potential outcome.

I didn't think it was a very remote possibility a year ago and Biden's escalation is a factor. But, I agree, this move is ominous.

[JimRed]

A Uke special forces raid to obtain a few if them might even the odds a bit.