Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rfp1234

On the contrary, I’m reasonably sure it would.
That’s why deploying them in Russia’s face now just might give pause to future further bad behavior on their part. Poker on a bigger scale. Were none of these weapons ever to be used? That seems unlikely, don’t you think?


11 posted on 06/16/2023 1:20:22 PM PDT by desertsolitaire ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: desertsolitaire
“ Poker on a bigger scale”

Yeah, it’s all just a big game. Fool.

14 posted on 06/16/2023 1:27:43 PM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: desertsolitaire; All

Be careful what you wish for. Brandon and Blinken are HARDLY who you want in the Driver’s Seat if this thing actually goes HOT!

Lord, Help Us! We don’t deserve it, but PLEASE! Not. This.


15 posted on 06/16/2023 1:29:16 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: desertsolitaire

One reason for Russia to put nukes in Belarus is to deter a Polish / NATO invasion. If the nukes were deployed in Kiev,
that wouldn’t alter Russia’s main goals: holding on to Donbas & Crimea.

Ultimately a stalemate and Cold War II would ensue. Western Ukraine would become a very unstable analogue of West Germany.

Playing nuclear chicken by putting nukes near the front lines won’t work for NATO. Several of its governments would fall instantly.


17 posted on 06/16/2023 1:48:33 PM PDT by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson