Hey Look! Proof Democrats Doctored J6 Evidence

This isn’t surprising. The committee, which was entirely handpicked by Nancy Pelosi, was never concerned with an objective presentation of facts. In fact, we’ve known since 2021 that the committee doctored text messages to make them look incriminating.

Just the News identified at least two instances where the committee’s video montage, which was broadcasted live and on C-SPAN in June 2022, did not disclose that the audio had been overlaid from another unidentified source onto the original silent footage. Numerous current and former Capitol Police officials, along with important lawmakers and congressional aides, have confirmed that the closed-circuit cameras used to capture the footage do not record sound and that the audio was added later.

According to a former spokesman for the Jan. 6 committee, the panel had a policy to clearly indicate any videos that were dubbed with audio from another source. The panel did follow this policy on certain occasions within the sizzle reel.

Just the News discovered two significant pieces of closed circuit television (CCTV) footage from the Capitol Police which did not have sound-recording abilities but featured added dramatic audio. One showed the intense breach of a crucial Capitol entrance by rioters from an inside angle, and the other provided an aerial view of the agitated crowd outside. Capitol Police officials confirmed that the camera system used for capturing this footage did not have the capability to record sound.

However, the footage presented by the committee during their video montage inexplicably included audio, without any disclaimer indicating that it had been dubbed.

“What the American people want to know is the truth, and this was nothing but a Hollywood production,” Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) told the Just the News, No Noise television show Friday night.

For some time now I have been pointing to video used to push the narrative that still preserves evidence that capitol hill cops were involved in setting folks up.

What follows is a response to someone looking for evidence.

Maybe if the evidence you use is something put forward by those supporting, even celebrating the official J6 narrative and you can use that to show shenanigans?

The presentation idea hinges on it not being edited by us deplorables, because it’s bad when we do it even if all that was done is just cutting it down a bit.

Still, do not be surprised if they Sgt Shultz up.

Anyhoo, this is how I put it....

Does anyone think the 1/6 hearing are “gotcha” hearings?

If it can be shown ANYWHERE to be a “gotcha” then suspicion of EVERYWHERE becomes in play.

Now, I know Left will ramble on and on about anything being “edited” … and this is no exception. BUT this was edited by J6 narrative supporters who are proclaiming the officer in question to be a hero, so it’s their doing the editing and still, I maintain, I will be able to show shenanigans.

So, here is a link to the video, and if you are seeing the same still picture that I’m seeing before you press the play button I want to start with this still image because it contains vital information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxd_AnpUuMo

1. there is the hero capitol cop, he has his hand on his gun and he is pointing at people …

2. who are in a hall in the capitol building who …

3. some of which have their hands up in response to his having his hand on his gun.

4. and obviously somone is taking this picture.

But there are more also important details, remember don’t press “play” yet.

5. behind the officer is a junction which, as you look at the still you will find that there is a doorway to the right (by the sign) and a stairway to the left …

6. and on the floor between these is a nightstick … and in this still no other person is in sight.

In the immediate wake on J6 some of the source video from which this video was crafted was up on YouTube and I saw that parent video used to make this one.

So now press play and be prepared for some high praise of the officer … including mention of him leading protestors … which is actually what he did in the original video and which he was doing in the still.

He was leading these people to this very intersection of hall, doors and stairs … and nightstick.

As the officer’s account begins about 46 seconds in note that he has picked up the nightstick and is brandishing it, and not his gun which he had previously, provably, grasped in its holster as he turned to face those he had been leading to this spot.

Now, remember this is an edited video so MSNBC loops back and replays earlier footage at 1:02 where you can see him pick up the nightstick off of the floor where it had been placed.

The officer’s narrative of these events claims he didn’t know these people were this deep in the building BUT he had been leading them and we know this because they say he did and he was not in the intersection in the still picture.

A question: which is more effective for self defense? A gun or a nightstick?

They are shown raising their hands just from him grasping, but not drawing, his sidearm.

But there is more to see at 1:02, for someone is on the stairs taking this video. They can be seen at 1:11 from video taken from within that crowd of people.

What has been edited out of these videos that I saw back in the day is that when he picked up the nightstick he was centered in the video, it was not cropped, not vertical formal, and also seen was a photographer who stepped around the corner at the exact moment to start taking pictures, he was in the part of the image that MSNBC cropped out.

Just this small part of the video is enough, I will maintain, to prove shenanigans.
Watch what happens though in this video, for they do not show him acting like he is retreating up the stairs without chopping up the footage.

In the unedited version I will simply say you would have seen a slower movement with several poses taken brandishing the nightstick and not using video from the crowd. If someone wanted, they can call me a liar and I do not care … the MSNBC version is enough.

It proves the nightstick was left for him to pick up, a nightstick makes it much easier to believe that he was under threat than his gun does.

It is enough to show that the location was prearranged and that this “hero” is taking part in a frame up job.

He led them to this location, had to have been aware of the role he was to play, and he executed his assigned acting … as did people put in place to ensure that there would be video that would be useful.

How much did he, this “hero”, get paid to help ruin these people’s lives?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.