He actually says that his lab is studying recovered materials from a UFO and is going to present such evidence. He has testified to Senate and House classified committees on this.
Just my opinion, but, as I have said on the earlier thread, Nolan may be telling the truth as he knows it or he may be lying (for what reason we would have to speculate).
What is well established though are his credentials as a full professor who brings a huge amount of funding to Stanford Medical School and who is a highly recognized scientist around the world.
Why present a press release without the “evidence”? He overwhelmingly likely doesn’t have anything real.
Dr Nolan is out of his area of expertise, and is entitled to no more credibility than you or I or Bill Gates.
The role of Stanford professor as nut case has been well established by Paul Ehrlich. Apologies to the great German/Jewish biologist of the same name.
“It’s there. I was working with a group about seven or eight years ago and I literally got within a few weeks of gaining access to one of the objects. And when the people who didn’t want us to gain access to it found out about it they pulled some bureaucratic administrative tricks and snatched it away.”
and that he has studied the brains of people claiming alien encounters.
“Just my opinion, but, as I have said on the earlier thread, Nolan may be telling the truth as he knows it or he may be lying (for what reason we would have to speculate).”
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Just like the Kraken, people always claim to have the evidence, but they will show it to us "in the future."
That never happens, because they don't have it.
maybe he shouldnt have said anything until he presented the evidence