Nice try Poindexter.
Ah vice…
The weekly world news of the internet
If it wasn’t for climate change, Chicago would still be under a mile of ice.
Ice has gone bankrupt. Went wokey wimmin.
The difference between normal people and eco-morons is that we accept climate change is happening - as it always has. Just not anthropomorphic climate change.
These people have so little meaning in their own tiny little lives, that they have to make up monstrous lies to claim the ability to change the climate of a planet.
If it wasn’t for catalytic converters making our pollution from our vehicles and industry miraculously change from plunging us into an extinction level ICE AGE in the 60’s. 70’s and early 80”s to out of control Global Warming threatening spontaneous combustion on a planetary scale. God only knows where we would be now. I thank God for any global warming every day and will do anything I can to help the planet continue to warm in an effort to stave off the next Ice Age, which is GUARANTEED..
Thankfully, not a real science explanation there. Easy pickings for anyone who passed a 1950s senior physics class.
Journalists are so damned stupid. Of course, they ARE journalists.
My question to a climate activist is *Are you a meteorologist*?
Every airborne private jet in the two years when Democrats had the power to ban them from US skies blasted out massive volumes of CO2 enriched air that said even DC Democratic politicians don’t believe in Al Gore’s religion.
Joe Biden is hell bent on banning guns, but he has yet to demand that Bill Gates jet get grounded.
Dear climate cultists - what is the correct temperature?
When Democratic-run states hand out driver licenses to invaders to drive around in ICE cars am I really supposed to believe that ICE cars threaten the whole earth?
I don’t see: the “climate change” we’re seeing is completely normal. Go away and get a life.
, in that list.
The biggest difference between, “weather,” and, “climate,” is that the trained meteorologist on the local news can’t tell you what the local temperature will be in a week with any great degree of certainty, but an idiot teenage girl from Sweden can tell you what global temperatures will be in a hundred years with unwavering accuracy.
So, "Vice", What You are actually saying is that Europeans are even dumber and more easily propagandized than Americans.
It is up to you to prove that you are right.
It is not up to me to prove you wrong.
Just because someone makes, or many people make, a defective argument to you does not prove that you are right about something.
I noticed that none of the “arguments” involved science, but instead were all rhetorical disagreements.
The simple question is, “What caused the end of the last ice age? and on the Flipside, what starts the beginning of an ice age?
I just committed a serious Freeper faux pas - I actually read the article (well, skimmed it, actually - let’s not get crazy). Funny thing, none of the 12 so-called arguments are actually arguments that reality-based people use except possibly for #9 (that fossil fuels have lifted millions from poverty).
Most of their so-called “arguments” actually start from the assumption that “climate change” is a real threat. We are not arguing from that perspective - we are arguing that climate change is a natural part of the world’s complex climate system, more fueled by the great nuclear fusion reactor we are located near than any action on man’s part, and nothing we do can alter it to any significant degree.
Plus all the other arguments not mentioned - that there is little or no discernible correlation between atmospheric CO2 and temperature, that much of the data that shows a correlation has been falsified to that effect, that computer models only predict what the biased men who programmed them told them is important, that a few volcanic eruptions spew out way more CO2 than we do, that sea level has not risen anywhere near what was predicted, that more CO2 means more plant growth and more food, etc. etc. etc.
The person who wrote this either has never argued with someone who knows anything or is being deliberately obtuse.
I’ve got one they can”t answer. There are numerous instances of mastodon and wooly mammoth bones being dug up while excavating in my part of the world, South Texas. People find mammoth and mastodon teeth on our beaches regularly. McFadden NWR continues to produce artifacts from many millennia ago. Climate change has always happened, and it will continue to happen. Humans don’t have a damn thing to do with it.
EVERYONE can agree pollution is bad, and it should be stopped. And they are welcome to believe anything they want.
So why must they demand that we believe it too?
Everyone can agree that someone has the right to believe that a man can become a woman. But they don’t have to right to demand that we believe it too.
I am starting to see a pattern here.