Posted on 05/09/2023 10:58:34 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Right . . .
If you’re gonna start an editorial with a lie better make sure it’s a doozey.
...and just how many has it killed (so far)?
Kill 30M to save 20M? They say 80% of all statistics cited are pulled out of thin air. (Want to know where I got that 80% number?)
Well he is a doctrinaly pure practitioner. While I am sure the genie can’t be put back in the bottle this guy is cool with more large scale experiments. Even if he says he doesn’t support that he does. Believes the covid mrna Vax saved lives and covid took lives. Covid protocols killed people. Not Covid. The Vax program is dangerous inherently and dangerous in the extreme despite this guy’s reasonable tone. Harnesses the full cohesive power of government boot iron and money to make the unwashed masses do as they are directed.
It’s like saying I saved someone’s life on the highway because I didn’t drive my car yesterday.
It’s a stretch to call the mRNA vaccines synthetic biology.
Huge stretch to claim they saved 20 million lives.
Nonsense to compare Covid deaths to atomic bomb blast.
Considering that the annual Flu, which kills about the same number as what COVID is attributed with, went to zero, while COVID suddenly included gunshots, suicides, car accidents, cancers, accidents, suicides and old age; it begs the question, how many would have died if Dr. Fauci hadn’t stolen millions of US taxpayer dollars, and given it to China to create this strain of bioweapon in the first place.
This is an interesting assertion, but it cannot be proved.
Consider I inject you with a sterile solution, harmless to you. You do not die. I say my injection saved your life. Prove it didn't.
One may peruse the current lit and fluff about "proving a negative" or "not proving a negative." and there will be found proponents on both sides. So, my harmless injection saved you life. Prove it did not. That is the game today.
If one goes to the study linked in STAT, the title of the paper is "Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study."
From the article: "The impact of COVID-19 vaccination programmes was determined by estimating the additional lives lost if no vaccines had been distributed. We also estimated the additional deaths that would have been averted had the vaccination coverage targets of 20% set by COVAX and 40% set by WHO been achieved by the end of 2021."
Modelling. Estimates and estimates and modelling of the estimates. This is called "success" in the STAT article. The funders of the study which is a modelling of estimates? Wanna guess?
"Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust; WHO; UK Medical Research Council; Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; National Institute for Health Research; and Community Jameel."
We proved by estimating and modelling our estimates, and that is SUCCESS! Prove us wrong? But what about prove us right? A quick word count finds the "study" has over ninety instances of "estimate." But that's an estimate....
Here is the Lancet link: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00320-6/fulltext
This article is propaganda that intends to drive research income streams. The alleged “mRNA vaccine” is not a vaccine.
>>> It’s a stretch to call the mRNA vaccines synthetic biology.
Not really. The genetic sequence in the MRNA package by their own admission is a computer generated one based on variants. It (DNA sequence for the spike protein) does not occur in nature... Thereby it is SYNTHETIC. Therefore, if your body actually produces it after taking the jab, we are literally dealing with synthetic biology.
Moderna = MODified Experimental RNA
It contains graphene which accumulates in the brain; not good.
Synthetic biology refers to living organisms.
Modified bacteria.
>>> Synthetic biology refers to living organisms. Modified bacteria.
Modified bacteria is not necessarily synthetic. We have modified living organisms for decades... but that can simply involve manipulating WHAT IS ALREADY THERE. (naturally occuring)
Biology = Life... of which there is only 1 creator... God Himself.
Synthetic = Synthesized/replicated/reproduced/artificial/MAN MADE
So if you can successfully SYNTHESIZE a living organism via DNA sequencing, and then somehow intermingle that into something already living, you technically have a cross between that which is man made, and that which is created by God. Transhumanism is basically the same thing, only uses machines (bionics) Synthetic biology is the next step, and is clearly evident in MRNA gene therapy.
Words have very distinctive meanings.
Whether it is bacteria, an amoeba, or a human blood cell, synthetic biology is BY DEFINITION man-made life.
They are literally literally trying to play God here.
Have you heard of synthetic blood? yet another example. (I don’t know how successful they’ve been with that though)
Ultimately, the goal is create a synthetic organism that is not reliant upon a living host... and i’ve seen videos/reports that claim this to be one of the objectives in the vaccine trials (parasitic variant of hydra-vulgaris) True? Hoax? who knows... but we know they are trying it.
the “vaccines” did not save any lives, but they ended a lot of lives.
“ Modified bacteria is not necessarily synthetic.”
That is true.
“ Synthetic biology is the next step, and is clearly evident in MRNA gene therapy.”
Yes. That’s gene therapy.
“ So if you can successfully SYNTHESIZE a living organism via DNA sequencing, and then somehow intermingle that into something already living…”
Yes. That’s synthetic biology and has been done.
>>> Yes. That’s synthetic biology and has been done.
Cool!... then we can agree that it’s NOT a stretch to call the covid-19 MRNA injections synthetic biology.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.