Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Play stupid games win stupid prizes. This lawyer can take a walk...
1 posted on 05/09/2023 7:25:05 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ChicagoConservative27

Wonder what their screen names are.


2 posted on 05/09/2023 7:25:50 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Follow the money. Even if it leads you to someplace horrible it will still lead you to the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

and...how does the evil broad afford these lawyers?


3 posted on 05/09/2023 7:25:52 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Here's the deal:

The way the American legal system works is for each side to throw everything they have at it. Unlike the French system where all the lawyers are "seeking truth" - works fine for your average case, but if there's a lot of publicity and some social pressure, it does not work at all (see Alfred Dreyfus).

It has its downside - wealthier people get better representation as a general rule. Although the public defenders do a surprisingly good job, and you're better off with one of them than picking somebody out of the phone book.

A criminal defense lawyer friend of mine says, when people ask him "how can you defend this guilty person?" -- "My job is not to get somebody off . . . it's to make the State prove its case." Because when the entire machinery of the State plus public opinion is against a criminal defendant, it's not a fair fight unless the defense gives its all.

(I've been in the legal biz since 1980, in the appeals system for over 30 years. Never been in criminal practice so I have no axe to grind.)

4 posted on 05/09/2023 7:33:18 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Why is more space given to the attorneys than to the person who apparently was responsible for the tragedy? What’s her story - background etc.?


6 posted on 05/09/2023 7:47:28 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Uh, I am kind of dumb. She was driving drunk, killed a bride, was caught and this fool says, “Do not rush to judgment?” I am simply guessing but it may be that I am smarter than this scheister! ;-)


8 posted on 05/09/2023 8:08:25 AM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Land is simply a place I visit until I can return to the sea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

My opinion would be (not that anyone would care) that judging a person’s ability to drive strictly by their blood alcohol level is a miscarriage of justice.

A non drinker can and often is more impaired after one beer or glass of wine, than someone who drinks a six pack a week is if they blow .08.

Anybody can be hit by a car if they behave in a stupid way. That should be taken into consideration.

Just so you know, I’m a non drinker...


9 posted on 05/09/2023 8:29:22 AM PDT by babygene (Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

BS. She was drunk and driving at a high rate of speed.
She was wrong and ended up killing someone.

She’s guilty of causing her death.

There’s no *judgment* there.

Those are the facts.


11 posted on 05/09/2023 8:41:26 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson