Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pete Dovgan

The RamJet was very inefficient at low speed, because it relies on compression of air to burn the fuel effectively. “

I’m into pulsejets and ramjets as a hobby, maybe even an invention. I have a chart somewhere that shows ramjet efficiency equals turbojet at about Mach 2.4.


31 posted on 05/09/2023 6:28:48 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: DaxtonBrown

I’m into pulsejets and ramjets as a hobby, maybe even an invention. I have a chart somewhere that shows ramjet efficiency equals turbojet at about Mach 2.4.

Find the chart after Mach 2.4 for a Ramjet.
Crew have personally told me that to date NOBODY knows how fast the SR-71 really is, because they were never allowed to reach maximum speed of the Ramjet. The Titanium airframe couldn’t take what the Ramjet could produce. They did mention that the plane was ‘rated’ to Mach 2.5, but stated they felt it was ‘much faster’.

So.....How long has the US had manned Hypersonic Nuclear bombers again? Oxcart anyone?


62 posted on 05/09/2023 8:40:00 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson