Proof that the Vaccines Were a Military-Backed Countermeasure

brownstone.org ^ | May 3, 2023 | Sasha Latypova

[ransomnote]

[H/T Red Badger]

Here is a high-level review of the manufacturing contracts between US DOD and Moderna. 

Moderna’s injection, mRNA-1273 is co-owned with the US Government, as the company has been funded by the defense research grants for years and also received intellectual property transfers from the US Government, in addition to preclinical and clinical research work conducted for Moderna by the NIH Vaccine Research Center. The NIH and Moderna each have a separate Investigational New Drug number for this product.

Moderna entered 2 types of contracts with the US Government for Spikevax injection:

• “Vaccine” contract and amendments that specifies R&D projects that the US Government ordered and paid for. Note that in Pfizer’s case no R&D activities were ordered or paid for by the US Government, as these were excluded from the scope of the contract.
• “Manufacturing” contract(s) that ordered a large-scale manufacturing. This is different from Pfizer manufacturing contracts as the words “demonstration” and “prototype” are not used. I believe this is because OTA contracts must be for prototypes but FAR contracting doesn’t have to be.

Note on redactions. In both Moderna and Pfizer’s contracts many areas are redacted indicating a reason for redaction – the “redaction codes.” Redacted content has been given codes b (4) and b (6), standing for:

(b) (4) Disclosure of information that would affect the application of advanced technology in a U.S. weapons system,

and

(b) (6) Disclosure of information, including information of foreign governments, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States.

There are several versions of the contract available, plus amendments. The first version was signed on August 9, 2020 and the last available version is June 15, 2021. In one of them the name of the signatory on the Moderna side was redacted with (b)(6). In another version it’s unredacted – it was Hamilton Bennett, a senior director of vaccine access and partnerships. 

MORE AT LINK: https://brownstone.org/articles/proof-vaccines-were-military-backed-countermeasure/

 

[semimojo]

...which shows there are not statistically meaningful differences.

You wish.

The part of the study you quoted relates to people that had been admitted to the ICU.

Admittedly, once someone reaches that state the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated isn't much.

But what you're ignoring is the fact that you're 10X more likely to make it to the ICU if you're not vaccinated.

"...population-based rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalization were approximately 10.5 times higher in unvaccinated adults compared with adults vaccinated with a primary series and a booster dose during January to April 2022, when the Omicron variant was predominant."

The vaccines were effective.

[Fledermaus]

Been there , done that.

[Fledermaus]

If you even believe their statistics.

During a pandemic data takers are plentiful with all the nurse and doctor shortages?

Hmmm. Want to buy a bridge? /sarc

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Proof that the Vaccines Were a Military-Backed Countermeasure, semimojo wrote:

Depends what you consider effective.

 

"In this cross-sectional study of US adults hospitalized with COVID-19 during January 2022 to April 2022 (during Omicron variant predominance), COVID-19-associated hospitalization rates were 10.5 times higher in unvaccinated persons and 2.5 times higher in vaccinated persons with no booster dose, respectively, compared with those who had received a booster dose. Compared with unvaccinated hospitalized persons, vaccinated hospitalized persons were more likely to be older and have more underlying medical conditions."

The study you cite is completely comprimised - it's merely backside covering bought and paid for by CDC/Pharma and NIH.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Yousey-Hindes, Lynfield, Sutton, Talbot, and Meek reported grants from US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the conduct of the study. Dr Anderson reported grants from Pfizer, Sanofi, GSK, Janssen, MedImmune, Regeneron, PaxVax, Micron, and Merck as well as personal fees from Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi, GSK, Janssen, Medscape, Kentucky BioProcessing Inc, and WCG and ACI outside the submitted work; additionally, his institution has also received funding from the National Institutes of Health to conduct clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. Drs Reeg and Kohrman reported grants from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services during the conduct of the study. Drs Billing and Shiltz reported grants from the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CTSTE) and the CDC Dr Schaffner reported grants from CDC during the conduct of the study as well as personal fees from VBI Vaccines outside the submitted work. Drs Hill and George reported grants from CSTE during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by the CDC through an Emerging Infections Program cooperative agreement (grant CK17-1701) and through a CSTE cooperative agreement (grant NU38OT000297-02-00).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: CDC was involved with the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2796235

 

[semimojo]

The study you cite is completely comprimised

You wish.

This is just an analysis of hospitalizations and deaths reported to the CDC by states, healthcare organizations and nursing homes.

Many states and other organizations have reported very similar numbers and I’ll be happy to post those links (again) if you wish.

Using your best source what do you think the difference in hospitalization rate was during the Omicron wave?

[ransomnote]

I know the CDC lied through it’s teeth for 3 years to utterly disastrous effect, so I’m not going to refer to its ‘documentation.’ You support ‘the narrative’ and I do not.

[cgbg]

Thanks for carrying the flag for the good guys against the Big Pharma propaganda narrative.

Big Pharma is all in on “saving the planet”.

https://www.pfizer.com/about/responsibility/environmental-sustainability

That means reducing the population—it is just that simple.

Obviously they see lying as a critical tactic in their battle.

[9YearLurker]

Nope, sorry, wrong.

This was right after the (completely bogus) PCR test was recalled but still used, with additional guidance from the CDC that considered jab status beyond the test results in the diagnosis of Covid.

Totally intended to gin up the false narrative, with massive payments to hospitals for cooperating.

[semimojo]

This was right after the (completely bogus) PCR test was recalled but still used, with additional guidance from the CDC that considered jab status beyond the test results in the diagnosis of Covid.

The study was of people who were hospitalized and/or died.

You bring up the PCR test as if it was relevant.

If these people didn't really have Covid what disease drove them to the ICU and in some cases killed them?

[9YearLurker]

All sorts of things drive the sick and dying to the ICU. And as the Scarf Lady admitted three years ago, they counted anything they possibly could as a “Covid death”.

These scumbags knew that there was a significant spike in deaths (no pun intended) within a couple of weeks of getting jabbed — and so for the first time ever counted those in that timeframe unjabbed. Just imagine what that one move could do for the numbers they were spinning up.

Grieving families regularly saw not only their hospital, but also burial, costs go away as long as they allowed a hint of potential Covid to be marked on the death certificate.

[semimojo]

All sorts of things drive the sick and dying to the ICU.

True, but during the pandemic there were over 1 million excess deaths. Close to the number of reported Covid deaths.

What killed these 1 million people?

[9YearLurker]

You’ve got it all wrong, I tell you.

First, for the first time ever, we had those with the usual winter flu or even pneumonia to go home and wait until their oxygen levels were critically low before they even saw a doctor. They were then more likely to need to be admitted and once admitted they were declared Covid positive and force given deadly Remdesivir, high-level vent treatment, etc. During that first few months we went from a high flu season to zero diagnosed flu, literally overnight. Still, the average age of death was at or over the average life expectancy.

The next and more prolonged spike in deaths came with the rollout of the jabs. Ed Dowd has published lots of actuarial data associating the excess deaths and disabilities, which both skewed to a much younger population than the initially killed and miscounted elderly, to the jabs.

Have you not seen his data?

[semimojo]

First, for the first time ever, we had those with the usual winter flu or even pneumonia to go home and wait until their oxygen levels were critically low before they even saw a doctor.

Except we had almost no flu during the pandemic.

And we have very quick, accurate antigen tests for flu so we know it really wasn't there.

The next and more prolonged spike in deaths came with the rollout of the jabs. Ed Dowd has published lots of actuarial data associating the excess deaths and disabilities...

The problem is about half of the excess deaths occurred in 2020, before the vaccines were deployed.

And Dowd's numbers don't track at all with number of vaccinations. The spike you reference isn't there.

His increases don't correspond with an increase in shots.

[9YearLurker]

No, they systematically stopped testing for flu—after having jad a really bad start to the flu season. Where were you?

And I refer you again to what I just wrote about the two phases. At this point you seem wilfully obtuse.

You are wrong on Dowd, so at this point I take it I am corresponding with a disinfo account.

[semimojo]

No, they systematically stopped testing for flu...

I know for a fact that isn't true. I had a family member test positive for flu in late 2020.

Do you have a single citation to back that claim up?

It seems you're fabricating a reason because you can't eplain the 1.2M US excess deaths without Covid.

You are wrong on Dowd, so at this point I take it I am corresponding with a disinfo account.

Here are daily covid deaths:

And here are daily vaccinations:

Notice they don't line up, and there's a huge drop in deaths right around the peak in vaccinations.

Dowd has a sexy story but doesn't have the data to back it up.

[9YearLurker]

You’re a misinformation fraud.

The Covid PCR test has always been bogus — and most especially when spun up to 45 times or more, as recommended to create tests from nothing. Therefore the Covid deaths are bogus as well. As is trying to discredit Dowd by aligning a few months of jabs with purported “Covid deaths”.

I’m done with responding to such deadly sophistry.

[semimojo]

Therefore the Covid deaths are bogus as well

So what caused the more than a million excess deaths? Your made up flu excuse fell flat.

As is trying to discredit Dowd by aligning a few months of jabs with purported “Covid deaths”.

Fair enough, I'll see if I can find the graphs on all cause mortality and we'll see if they line up against vaccinations.

Something Dowd would have done was he serious about anything but making money.