New research reveals that most child victims of gun violence are innocent bystanders

Medical X Press / ^ | May 2, 2023 | University of Missouri

[Paal Gulli]

New research reveals that most child victims of gun violence are innocent bystanders

by University of Missouri

A University of Missouri School of Medicine researcher examining the circumstances behind pediatric firearm assaults found that most child shooting victims were shot outdoors for unknown reasons and were likely not intentionally targeted.

Firearm injuries surpassed motor vehicle accidents as the leading cause of child deaths in 2020. Assault has become the most common cause of firearm injury among American children and adolescents, surpassing firearm suicide and accidental firearm injuries. However, very little research exists examining the circumstances behind these pediatric assaults.

A group of researchers led by Mary Bernardin, MD, assistant professor of clinical emergency medicine and pediatric emergency medicine, examined cases of children who presented to St. Louis Children's Hospital with firearm injuries from 2014 to 2017. The researchers found that 72% of these children were shot outdoors by an unknown shooter, whose motivation was unknown in 93% of cases.

"Prior research has often described pediatric firearms victims as victims of assault between people who are known to each other, which implies fault on the part of the victim," said Bernardin. "This research shows that in most cases children who are shot may not have been the intended target and that the victim and shooter are unknown to each other."

According to the research, the most common circumstance was being shot outdoors by an unknown shooter with an unknown motivation. The second most common description was a drive-by shooting. These shootings were often described by victims as occurring while the child was doing outdoors activities, such as walking home from school, playing in the park, or sitting on the stoop of their house.

Fewer than 15% of shootings were obvious intentional assaults, which would include disputes or attempted robberies. Three high-risk incident ZIP codes in St. Louis City accounted for 40% of the shootings.

"Children residing in areas where shootings are frequently occurring are suffering an increasing number of firearm injuries and deaths," said Bernardin. "To better inform appropriate public policy interventions, we must understand why and how these shootings are happening. Most children are victims of circumstance simply because of the underlying conditions of the neighborhoods in which they live and not victims because of any actions of their own."

"Child firearms injury circumstances and associations with violence intervention program enrollment" was recently published by the Journal of Surgical Research. In addition to Bernardin, the study co-authors included researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and St. Louis Children's Hospital. This study follows earlier research led by Bernardin finding that surges in COVID-19 infection rates were associated with an increase in the frequency and mortality of pediatric firearm injuries.

[freeandfreezing]

The characterization of the situations where the shootings occur puts a real spin on reality:

"According to the research, the most common circumstance was being shot outdoors by an unknown shooter with an unknown motivation. The second most common description was a drive-by shooting. These shootings were often described by victims as occurring while the child was doing outdoors activities, such as walking home from school, playing in the park, or sitting on the stoop of their house."

They left out the parts about the party going on, the drug dealing nearby, the prior interactions with gangs, the dispute a few days earlier, and all the other things you see when you watch the actual witnesses to these terrible crimes talk about what happened.

[bobbo666]

Yeah, another crappola study with an agenda more important than facts.

[Ozymandias Ghost]

From the study:

“This cross-sectional study included children aged 6-17 y who presented to an urban level 1 pediatric trauma center with firearm injuries from 2014 to 2017.”

So, when you compare this study to vehicle related injuries/deaths; you have skewed the results by basically eliminating most drivers due to the 6 to 17-year-old age restriction.

From the study:

“... 72% of victims were shot outdoors by an unknown shooter, the motivation of (sic) which was unknown in 93% of cases. 36% of these shootings were ‘drive-by.’”

So, the study ultimately concludes from this that most shooting victims were “innocent bystanders.” An honest conclusion would be that we do not know whether the victims were innocent bystanders or rival gang members. I'm sure there were individuals from both categories.