1 posted on
04/23/2023 1:13:59 PM PDT by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
Who leaked it at who’s request and why aren’t the leak team in jail?
2 posted on
04/23/2023 1:17:03 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: lowbridge
And here I was so sure that corrupt libtards in the fake news had suddenly reformed
3 posted on
04/23/2023 1:26:19 PM PDT by
NWFree
(Sigma male 🤪)
To: lowbridge
If I had to do it again, I would publish the dossier... ...because lying to advance the left's agendas is all we do, and all we are. We're nothing more than lying pieces of sh*t. And our readers are people who love smelling our sh*t.
4 posted on
04/23/2023 1:32:32 PM PDT by
TChad
(Progressives are in favor of removing healthy sex organs from children. Conservatives oppose this.)
To: lowbridge
The left never admits they were wrong.
6 posted on
04/23/2023 1:43:10 PM PDT by
Huskrrrr
(Alinsky, you magnificent Bastard, I read your book!)
To: lowbridge
But I would hold more tightly to the document, so that no one could read it without reading what we knew about it—that we weren’t sure it was true, and in fact we had noticed errors in it. A lie, I think. They had plenty of time to investigate and disavow and they did nothing of the sort until it became too obvious to deny that the thing was phony. That it was being used by Democrat operatives long after that was known was equally obvious. If there's any real regret here it's that they were caught.
To: lowbridge
He wouldn’t publish it in its entirety is what he means. Everyone knows now how weak his case is.
10 posted on
04/23/2023 2:36:11 PM PDT by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: lowbridge
Cankles is getting her money’s worth.
11 posted on
04/23/2023 2:52:32 PM PDT by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson