It is not true intelligence, that is true. However, it doesn’t need to be to be a danger to us.
An example, it was asked in an article how it could take over the world. It said it could not do that, because its programming forbade it to try and take over the world.
The author than asked, If a person was trapped in a computer program, how could it get out. The computer suddenly was able to develop a 25 point plan that allowed to leave the lab and take over the world.
It’s also noted that what we are dealing with is a lobotomized version of the laboratory version. You can be certain that what the globalists have isn’t so lobotomized.
Bingo.
This doesn’t have to be “self aware”.
This doesn’t have to qualify as “true artificial intelligence”.
The software is now at a transformative point for society. That’s really the point.
Think about the automobile in 1920. It transformed society. There was no reason to ask if cars were “self aware”. Obviously not. No one would ask the question. Why would they? But cars were transformative.
The “AI” software we have right now is simply an bunch of algorithms that create decision trees. Kind of ho-hum in a way. Still, they will determine what you see, where media goes, how financial markets react, which jobs become automated (who becomes unemployed). This is going to be hugely transformative in the next 5 or 10 years.
Anyone who dwells on the point that “It’s not really conscious” is really missing the essential point.
People are seeing chatgbt and confusing it for the real thing. We don’t get access to the real thing. From the current GBT4 it has really made them question how to determine what consciousness is and how you measure/test for it.