Looks to me like a solution in search of a problem. But they used “sustainable” three or four times in the short article, so it’s got to be good.
I think “sustainable” is the frosting on the “electric” cake. Or is it vice versa?
Between “sustainable” and “electric,” they’ve got an $8 billion order book. Having worked in a number of startup companies, I find that hard to believe. Maybe they talked to enough companies that COULD order $8 billion of product, but I seriously doubt they have $8 billion of orders. At $1 million per, that would be orders for 8,000 of the things. Even at $4 million each, that’s an order book of 2,000 units. And that would be across maybe a dozen markets? So each market ordered 170 units?
Clean is another big winner for Communists.
. The expansion has the potential to enable fulfillment of $8 billion in commercial orders by 2025 at the headquarters in Rhode Island.
Potential...... 8 billion
“... they used “sustainable” three or four times in the short article ...”
‘Sustainable’ has become a trigger word for me. As soon as I read that word in an article I know the content is leftist claptrap. I stop reading and move on.
‘Sustainable’ = Bull-shiite