[Disestablishmentarian]

And her [the deceased] “new homo sapiens” violates God’s Scriptural history which cancels her views for Christendom.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No, it does not in any way violate the teachings of Jesus and Apostles, nor Genesis. Fits right in as I see it.

You are of course entitled to your own interpretation.

Incidentally, parts of Genesis are a reinterpretation of the Sumerian knowledge of Homo sapiens history, presumably gained during the Israelites' Babylonian captivity. You might find of interest to check out "Apkallu."

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

All Scripture is inspired, inerrant and sufficient for all teaching.

I am NOT allowed my own interpretation and neither are you allowed to read between the lines to satisfy your own presuppositions learned from a humanist philosopher.

To end the propagation of this \blasphemy\ of Scripture plagiarized some pre-historic civilization, I’ll cease responding.

[genetic homophobe]

Incidentally, parts of Genesis are a reinterpretation of the Sumerian knowledge of Homo sapiens history, presumably gained during the Israelites’ Babylonian captivity. You might find of interest to check out “Apkallu.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Homo Sapiens? Sounds like somebody is trying to marry Christianity with the delusional rantings of Charlie Darwin.

[numberonepal]

Incidentally, parts of Genesis are a reinterpretation of the Sumerian knowledge of Homo sapiens history, presumably gained during the Israelites' Babylonian captivity. You might find of interest to check out "Apkallu."

And the Enuma Elish. Then revisit Gilgamesh in a whole new light. It's all happened before, and it will all happen again. As Uncle Clif says, "the Universe prefers novelty".