Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ought-six

France and Britain were NOT allies of Nazi Germany; they were foes, ==

In 1938 they were allies. They became foes in 1939. Also Stalin became ally in 1939 and France-UK-Poland had lost in 1939-40. BUT in 1941 Stalin became ally and this side won.

DO you notice? Actually it is same truth again. Germany was being winning till Russia was on her side. And Germany lost when she pushed Russia on a side on her enemy(US/UK coalition).

Similar thing happened in 19 century and in 18 century if you examine history closely. So the side which Russia(USSR) on, always wins.

Today a same thing. If Russia would be on a side of West then West wins. If not then West will lose. It is a fact.

But West by its stupid politics pushed Russia into embrace of China the geopolitical foe. And China also learned this lesson I showed above so she know perfectly having Russia on her side is victorious.


121 posted on 04/16/2023 11:43:11 AM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: nickfrost1

And it was France’s alliance with Russia that caused all of the turmoil of WWI and subsequently, WWII.

No France-Russia alliance, no WWI.


122 posted on 04/16/2023 11:45:11 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: nickfrost1

“In 1938 they were allies.”

You’re a liar, Ivan; which is par for the course for you folks.

What pact or agreement did France or Britain sign with Nazi Germany establishing an alliance? The 1938 Munich Agreement was not an alliance.

“DO you notice? Actually it is same truth again. Germany was being winning till Russia was on her side. And Germany lost when she pushed Russia on a side on her enemy(US/UK coalition). Similar thing happened in 19 century and in 18 century if you examine history closely. So the side which Russia(USSR) on, always wins.”

My God, don’t they teach you history in Russia? You just said, above, that Germany “...was being winning” — and I understand English is not your language, so I won’t criticize the atrocious grammar — “till Russia was on her side.” From that gibberish I can only assume you are saying that Germany was winning until Russia was on Germany’s side. WWII began on September 1, 1939, when Germany and Russia (USSR) were allies against Poland. The Russians (USSR) not only invaded Poland from the east, it also invaded Finland
— with whom Russia had a non-aggression pact — a couple months later. Russia’s excuse? The same excuse it ALWAYS trots out: To liberate ethnic Russians (the “Red Finns”), and, of course, to annex territory.

Russia (USSR) was making a claim for certain islands and territories that were Finnish — sound familiar, Ivan? — and on November 26, 1939 Russia (USSR) accused the Finns of shelling the village of Mainila. In fact, the Russians had shelled it in order to create a pretext for withdrawal from their non-aggression pact with Finland. Then, at the end of November, 1939 Russia (USSR) invaded Finland. The invasion was condemned internationally and Russia (USSR) was expelled from the League of Nations.

And you have the gall to go on and assert that since the 18th century whichever side Russia was on, won? How did that work out for you guys in 1905 against Japan, Ivan? Or in the Crimean War of 1853-1856, when Russia lost and had to give up the Danube Delta and Southern Bessarabia?

Give it up, Ivan; you are out of your league. You are a shameless propagandist; and, as is common with propagandists, you eventually sink yourselves. Which you have done.


139 posted on 04/16/2023 12:33:20 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson