“Or...begin with the 38 minute mark”
Seriously?
You post a TWO-HOUR video with no excerpt, then a-hole comment about the 38-minute mark to reveal a question we’ve ALL been asking since the beginning,
“What was really in those train cars?”
The entire video is idle speculation, and the substack/guest you failed to quote merely highlights the patently obvious once again: “Environmental crime.”
Many of us KNEW:
>that the burn was unjustified at the time it occurred.
>that the results would be dioxin poisoning of a wide area at the time it occurred.
>that the tests being performed were NOT comprehensive.
>that this smacked of a coverup from the get-go.
There are NO ANSWERS in this TWO-HOUR waste of time.
So, then, the presumption is that you are linked to Staus Coup and trying to drive up their modest viewership, or perhaps you YOURSELF had the breakthrough in watching a TWO-HOUR video on mere speculation.
Congratulations, Richard. /s
Interesting that your claim is....”The entire video is idle speculation,”
And then you PRESUME...BASED ON YOUR OWN “SPECULATION” the following......
“So, then, the presumption is that you are linked to Staus Coup and trying to drive up their modest viewership, or perhaps you YOURSELF had the breakthrough in watching a TWO-HOUR video on mere speculation.”
Actually, I have never heard of these YouTube contributors before today. But feel free to “speculate and presume”.