“Just ask the nearest cosmologist what happened 1 minute or 1 second BEFORE the so called ‘Big Bang’. They have no answer.”
Well some might hypothesize that time came into creation after the “Big Bang”. But that is also absurd, since without time, there can be no change, and without change, everything must still be in that singularity.
But the real problem with this scenario is that in order to explain how the matter could be compressed to such a small space and still escape, they have to dispense with gravity and other physical laws. “The laws of physics were different in the first tiny interval of time after the Big Bag”, they will say. However, this violates the assumption of uniformitarianism that underlies all speculative, historical science. Once you dispense with that, you cannot even hypothesize as to how the Earth came into existence, much less how the universe did. And you can’t simply dispense with it when it’s not convenient for your theory. Once the laws of physics can vary with time, then you must prove that they did not change at any point in history that you want to speculate about, which is impossible.
Good post.
Most “science” crashes and burns when you start to question the underlying assumptions.
They are just that—assumptions.
The “laws” of physics are human laws.
The universe is an outlaw.
Red Badger’s 4th Law of Thermodynamics:
You cannot change the other 3 Laws.............