Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Paltrow testifies that the accident wasn't her fault
MSN ^ | 03/25/2023 | Diana Dasrath and Doha Madani

Posted on 03/25/2023 7:37:20 AM PDT by simpson96

Gwyneth Paltrow was called to the witness stand Friday in a civil suit filed against her, where she disputed allegations that she caused an accident at Utah’s Deer Valley Resort in 2016 that left a man seriously injured.

Terry Sanderson, 76, who is seeking $300,000 from Paltrow, says she slammed into him from behind in a ski collision that left him with a concussion, brain injury and four broken ribs. But Paltrow alleges that it was actually Sanderson at fault and that he is exploiting her wealth.

(snip)

Paltrow was called to the stand Friday by Sanderson’s attorneys, after the jury heard from Sanderson's daughters, an eyewitness and medical experts.

Paltrow said she was “gently” skiing down the slope when she felt a body press into her back and saw two skis slide between hers. She and Sanderson fell to the ground, Paltrow said, adding that she momentarily froze before becoming upset and yelling an expletive at Sanderson.

Paltrow apologized for the outburst, saying she felt violated and initially believed the crash might have been a sexual assault.

“There was a body pressing against me and a very strange grunting noise,” she said.

(snip) Sanderson's acquaintance, Craig Ramon, (snip) testified Tuesday that he was roughly 35 feet uphill from Sanderson at the time of the accident.

Ramon said he heard a scream and within a few seconds, saw Paltrow slam into Sanderson from behind. He stopped beside them after seeing them both fall to the ground, saying Paltrow stood back up but Sanderson was facedown in the snow for about two minutes.

Paltrow did not speak to them, Ramon said, leaving about four minutes after the accident without identifying herself or asking if Sanderson was alright or needed medical attention.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: paltrow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2023 7:37:20 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

He said, she said. Oh well, that’s what courts are for.


2 posted on 03/25/2023 7:39:26 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: simpson96

Just write him a check you stupid selfish bitch.


4 posted on 03/25/2023 7:42:08 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Paltrow said she was “gently” skiing down the slope when she felt a body press into her back and saw two skis slide between hers. She and Sanderson fell to the ground, Paltrow said, adding that she momentarily froze before becoming upset and yelling an expletive at Sanderson.

Paltrow apologized for the outburst, saying she felt violated and initially believed the crash might have been a sexual assault.


I agree, not well paid. Even in writing ....................


5 posted on 03/25/2023 7:43:13 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Sexual assault on skies? Some interesting possibilities here. If one has a perverse mind.


6 posted on 03/25/2023 7:44:42 AM PDT by donozark (Colonel Tom Parker was a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘣𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘵, 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘭𝘵 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘩 𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘹𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘶𝘭𝘵.

Do a lot of struggle snuggles happen while skiing?


7 posted on 03/25/2023 7:45:04 AM PDT by Antihero101607
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
...[Paltrow] initially believed the crash might have been a sexual assault.

Sure. People always sexually assault other people bundled up in ski gear, out in the open, on ski slopes. And slamming into somebody from the rear is the most common type of sexual assault on the slopes.

8 posted on 03/25/2023 7:46:20 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
I haven't been following this very closely BUT I did see the testimony of another skier who wasn't with either party. He testified that she ran smack into the back of him, he hit the ground and was laid out, face first. She rolled off his right side and landed about 10 feet from him. Her instructor came up and was screaming at the guy that she hit - yelling at HIM for hitting her. The witness testified that it was all her fault. Then, she gets on the stand and announces that he hit her! I've only skied once but I never saw anyone skiing uphill backwards.
9 posted on 03/25/2023 7:46:55 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Maybe she can settle the case with a case of her vagina perfume.


10 posted on 03/25/2023 7:50:53 AM PDT by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

If this guy is after her wealth, he didn’t ask for a lot. With potential head injuries, he could have sued her for millions. $300,000 seems more like a settlement amount to avoid court.


11 posted on 03/25/2023 7:51:09 AM PDT by CommerceComet ("You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case, the government forgets the first." Rush Limbaugh )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

she is a despicable person. Saw her on a cooking show maybe 15 years ago and she was lecturing the host about how she only eats organic free range chicken and she won’t eat what she was served unless the host assured her it was free range. Just a totally spoiled, clueless B.


12 posted on 03/25/2023 7:54:13 AM PDT by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: imabadboy99

Not an untypical mindset of one of our “betters”. When you’ve got millions and time you can do a lot of things ordinary working folks can’t.


13 posted on 03/25/2023 7:57:03 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Even though the eye witness testified in detail that it was totally her fault and she took off and left the scene. 🙄


14 posted on 03/25/2023 7:58:53 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Having skied for many years, and had more than my share of wipe outs... tho only once involving another, I’d say if his skis were between hers and they both fell, for him to be face down in the snow would mean she would have to be under him. But instead, she landed 10 feet away somehow.

The most likely result would be her hitting him, him falling face down, and her ending up 10 ft away. Anything else would require serious contortions.


15 posted on 03/25/2023 7:59:37 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

This is more than “he said, she said”.

“Sanderson’s acquaintance, Craig Ramon, saw Paltrow slam into Sanderson from behind.”

“Paltrow said she was “gently” skiing down the slope when she felt a body press into her back and saw two skis slide between hers, saying she felt violated and initially believed the crash might have been a sexual assault.”

Sanderson’s witness’s account is plausible which Paltrow’s account is pretty far-fetched.

Does Sanderson have the “preponderance of the evidence” (i.e., that it is more likely than not) that the defendant is responsible for the harm the plaintiff has suffered? Looks like it to me, at least from what is written here (although I think Paltrow is a cutie or at least looked like it in Iron Man).

Not sure the Plaintiff’s $300K for his injuries (if the injuries are true) is “exploiting her wealth.”


16 posted on 03/25/2023 8:01:12 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

The article says Ramon was Sanderson acquaintance

This is hard to ascertain

Seems like payday to me

He wasn’t perm injured

Lawyers cultivate these cases they keep

I’m sure there have been talks but not enough


17 posted on 03/25/2023 8:01:34 AM PDT by wardaddy (Truth is treason in the Empire of lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

She’s probably never done an honest day’s work in her life.


18 posted on 03/25/2023 8:05:46 AM PDT by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: imabadboy99

I don’t think she has.


19 posted on 03/25/2023 8:08:02 AM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

What is it with the rich and powerful believing they’re above the law?!


20 posted on 03/25/2023 8:08:37 AM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson