Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

I thought LDL and overall was not a good indicator, and the ratio was a better indicator, but hommocysteine was the best.


4 posted on 03/22/2023 12:35:20 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

YESSSS! RATIO is far more important.
My HDL is low but so is my LDL.
Will be 83 year old next month, no heart issues in spite of blood pressure 135/85 usually.

Heart issues are pretty rare if one exercises 150 minutes every week. Unless of course one is smoker, fat and have very high blood pressure.


7 posted on 03/22/2023 12:45:33 PM PDT by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I have an odd situation. My heart calcium score is 2, but my LDL cholesterol is high, despite exercise (was an active fitness instruction until a year ago), and a decent (not perfect diet). The score was 0 three years ago, but I am 67 and my doctor said that it’s expected to go up a little as I age. She also said not to worry about the LDL rating because the calcium score was so low and I am not overweight. LDL problem is probably heriditary. Nothing I can do about it.


13 posted on 03/22/2023 2:02:04 PM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

lowest LDL-C group had a higher risk of all-cause mortality

Association between low density lipoprotein cholesterol and all-cause mortality: results from the NHANES 1999–2014
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-01738-w


16 posted on 03/22/2023 2:27:26 PM PDT by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson