Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cuz1961

Didn’t the Obama regime try to implement some kind of environmental order that effectively banned certain components in this drug? All in the name of environmental issues of all things.


11 posted on 03/04/2023 9:19:15 AM PST by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MachIV

I believe they banned the CFC propellant used that was very effective and replaced it with something that was not nearly as good. All in the name of protecting the ozone layer. And I think it was done at the end of Bush Jr.


16 posted on 03/04/2023 9:29:15 AM PST by Freedumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: MachIV

That would be HFC’s, which don’t have medicinal value, but were the inesrt gases used in albuteral inhalers. This forced asthmatics to use the less effective powder based inhalers. I’ll never forgive him for that.


18 posted on 03/04/2023 9:31:34 AM PST by eclecticEel ("The petty man forsakes what lies within his power and longs for what lies with Heaven." - Xunzi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: MachIV

They lost their Montreal Protocol exemption in 2005 and change formulations in 2008, but replacing CFC propellants wouldn’t cause severe shortages or even increase costs. It was actually the pharma companies who lobbied for it, as it allowed them to re-patent their drugs without having to really change anything.

There is a correlational between asthma and urbanization, so live where the air is cleaner for lower risk. Of course, the entire western USA is breathing China’s air pollution...


20 posted on 03/04/2023 9:38:08 AM PST by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson