We either need to cut some areas loose (start with where I live: New England) and end up with fewer than 50 states — or else we need to dice things up and have a lot more than 50 states: much of CA is Conservative. Greater Idaho sounds good. Texas could be three states at least. Heck, if you gerrymander New York state carefully you could probably create a new Conservative state there. Carefully carved up, Conservatives could wield a lot more power.
50 doesn’t work. I could see maybe 40 states. Or maybe 70 states. But the 50 we have right now has failed.
we need more states of smaller sizes.
More local representation is the correct answer.
Texas can be 3-4, CA should be 6-7, New york and florida can be 2-3 each. Oregon and Washington should be split in two.
Nevada and Arizona should be two as well.
No state should have more then 10 electoral votes in my opinion.
we need more states of smaller sizes.
More local representation is the correct answer.
Texas can be 3-4, CA should be 6-7, New york and florida can be 2-3 each. Oregon and Washington should be split in two.
Nevada and Arizona should be two as well.
No state should have more then 10 electoral votes in my opinion.