What? Realy? That was indeed a rebuttal just as my rebuttal was a rebuttal. Just because I cited only one of thousands of known crazy jury decisions doesn’t make my answer invalid.
Now you’re making up rules to win. Your attempt to say my rebuttal wasn’t a rebuttal and that your rebuttal wasn’t a rebuttal is hilarious, “I can’t think of anything smart to say, and you didn’t win because we weren’t arguing the right way” is essentially what you’ve said. haha
“Just because I cited only one of thousands of known crazy jury decisions doesn’t make my answer invalid.”
Well, citing a crazy criminal jury decision when first amendment case law is decided by judges in federal or the supreme court does make it invalid.