“Just because I cited only one of thousands of known crazy jury decisions doesn’t make my answer invalid.”
Well, citing a crazy criminal jury decision when first amendment case law is decided by judges in federal or the supreme court does make it invalid.
Lol we just covered that. So your rebuttal is that there are NO crazy, weird, unusual judgements made by judges? So you’re making new rules. That’s what 5 year olds do to win. Are you going to double dog dare me next?