Posted on 02/19/2023 12:37:27 PM PST by Tipllub
Updated: 5:56 PM CST February 18, 2023 COLUMBIA, S.C. — On Friday afternoon, a 13-year-old Furman Middle School student sat in his hospital bed asking for chicken nuggets and Gatorade - just 11 days after a stroke.
On Feb. 6, Daniel went to school like any normal day. He said he wasn't feeling well, and went to the front office of Furman Middle School to call his mom. At this point, his speech was slurred and he couldn't talk on the phone.
The staff in the front office asked his mother, Jennifer Lynch, to come to pick him up. Jennifer said that when she arrived she had to help her son to the car because he was weak and limp on his right side.
She took him home and let him sleep before sending him to Prisma Health Tuomey Hospital in Sumter. Since then, Lynch says the past week has been unnerving for her family. "We didn't expect a 13-year-old to ever go through this," she said.
(Excerpt) Read more at kens5.com ...
“He said he wasn’t feeling well, and went to the front office of Furman Middle School to call his mom. At this point, his speech was slurred and he couldn’t talk on the phone. “
And does anyone still think that Captain Obvious never ever comes within a thousand feet of a “publik skool”. And these clowns claim to know more about bringing up your chilluns than you do.
Egads, even a journalist (ptui-ptui) might generate an IQ point or two enough to say, “Call an ambulance”.
A stroke is one of the many symptoms of puberty circa 2023.
Before the ‘it’s the vaccine’ comments start, this poor child had an intracerebral aneurysm that ruptured. It was probably congenital. He’s very lucky to be alive. Hopefully, because he’s so young, he’ll brain has lots of plasticity and he will fully recover.
He’ll = his
One can hope. A ruptured berry aneurysm is usually fatal.
And hereditary. The rest of his family need a brian MRi ASAP.
Vaxxed?
Wait a minute! He was weak, slurring his words, and couldn’t talk on the phone, and the school officials didn’t immediately call an ambulance? And, the mother picked him up and just took him home for a nap?
She is lucky she has a live son!
“...asking for chicken nuggets and Gatorade - just 11 days after a stroke.”
Sounds like the kid wants a second stroke.
Uh.... they couldn't figure out how to dial nine eleven?
Sheesh.
Public school come for the grooming, stay for the neglect.
Aneurysm. Do you ghouls ever give up?
In this day & age asking the vax status is valid.
Yes aneurysms can be congenital but they can also be caused by the fake shots known as “COVID vaccines”.
The real ghouls are you jab apologists
So when was the kid last jabbed?
I’m not a jab apologist but will point out obvious errors and exaggerations. You belong to the ghouls who will dance on anyone’s misfortune or death if you think it will further your narrative. The label fits. Go salivate over someone else’s misfortune.
*laughing inappropriately*
>> Before the ‘it’s the vaccine’ comments start, this poor child had an intracerebral aneurysm that ruptured. It was probably congenital
So you’re ruling out the vax, and then on go on to say its likely congenital? Evidently, you have no idea what precipitated the stroke at the time of your post.
I told you in my post that it was a ruptured aneurysm. It was a hemorrhagic stroke (intracranial bleeding) which is entirely different than strokes occurring because of blood clots. Cerebral aneurysms in children very often occur in the context of familial/genetic syndromes. I know what precipitated the stroke, a bleeding intra-cerebral aneurysm.
My comments have nothing to do with whether or not the vaccine has precipitated potentially fatal complications/side effects. I believe it has, for the same reason that Covid itself causes life-threatening inflammation-associated complications. That said, this is an entirely different situation.
>> I told you in my post that it was a ruptured aneurysm.
Indeed you did, but that is in fact the stroke itself. You also stated “It was probably congenital”. And since strokes themselves are not inherited, you must be referring to an inherited cause — a cause that precipitated the stroke. But you effectively ruled out one cause in favor of another — yet doing so based on probability.
I don’t have a problem with opinion-based likelihoods, but the dismissals that aim to discredit disconcerting/inconvenient possibilities serve no factual purpose. That’s all. FRegards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.