More distraction and deflection - instead of talking about Chinese spy balloons and our apparent inability to defend against these low cost vehicles with anything less than jets and missiles costing hundreds of millions.
Oh, no - we have to take the ‘UAP’ discussion into the extraterrestrial camp to muddy the waters.
I think, in this situation, the term ‘retarded’ is apt and appropriate.
And the desire to insert an emotional retort ("retarded") seems inappropriate. Raises the question as to why someone is emotionally invested in the term "extraterrestrial." Is it fear?