Skip to comments.
Rolls-Royce Nuclear Engine Could Power Quick Trips to the Moon and Mars
gizmodo ^
| Kevin Hurler
Posted on 02/07/2023 8:28:50 AM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
1
posted on
02/07/2023 8:28:50 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
If you got to go to the moon or mars, you might as well go in style.
2
posted on
02/07/2023 8:32:02 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: DannyTN
3
posted on
02/07/2023 8:36:14 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: BenLurkin
4
posted on
02/07/2023 8:36:44 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: BenLurkin
How quick is ‘quick’?.................................
5
posted on
02/07/2023 8:37:00 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: DannyTN
If you got to go to the moon or mars, don’t forget your Grey Poupon
6
posted on
02/07/2023 8:37:43 AM PST
by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: Magnum44
Mars ain’t the kind of place to raise your kids.
7
posted on
02/07/2023 8:38:09 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: BenLurkin
I know how nuclear propulsion is used on board ships and subs, but I’m wondering how it would be used in spacecraft.
8
posted on
02/07/2023 8:45:18 AM PST
by
telescope115
(My feet are on the ground, and my head is in the stars.)
To: BenLurkin
the anti-nuke cult will object because they dont want nuclear waste raining down on the planet in the case of a contingency.
9
posted on
02/07/2023 8:45:43 AM PST
by
Samurai_Jack
(This is not about hypocrisy, this is about hierarchy!)
To: BenLurkin
The Jupiter 2 had a nuclear powered engine 😊
10
posted on
02/07/2023 8:46:24 AM PST
by
MachIV
To: BenLurkin
I assume Rolls-Royce is using the nuclear reactor to generate electricity for an Ion Drive engine.
The hardest part about using a nuclear reactor for space travel is making it light enough to launch, yet robust enough to survive an unplanned 'launch event.'
11
posted on
02/07/2023 8:46:29 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: dfwgator
In fact, it’s cold as hell
12
posted on
02/07/2023 8:51:51 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
To: dfwgator
13
posted on
02/07/2023 8:52:30 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
To: Mr. K
14
posted on
02/07/2023 8:52:48 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: dfwgator
15
posted on
02/07/2023 8:54:40 AM PST
by
Golden Eagle
(The LGBT indoctrination agenda is designed to outlaw the Bible, and anyone who believes it.)
To: BenLurkin
I love reading about technology that small minds shut down 60 years ago.
16
posted on
02/07/2023 8:56:45 AM PST
by
wildcard_redneck
(Germans are bat-crap crazy for cold showers, high energy bills, and boiled fturnips.)
To: wildcard_redneck
What about 90 minutes from New York to Paris. I was told that by ‘76 we’d by A-OK.
17
posted on
02/07/2023 8:57:45 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: BenLurkin
In order to make the “nuclear rocket” concept work, the primary function of the small atomic reactor is to supply sufficient heat so whatever the propellant may be, it is expelled as a hot stream of gas, giving the thrust comparable to the burn of liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen (or other rocket fuel), to lift heavy payloads from the ground and through space. As the atomic reactor heat unit is MUCH smaller than the size of the tanks that hold the liquid oxygen and liquid rocket fuel, and the propellant to be heated may something like simple water, the weight requirements are much lower, and an even greater payload is possible.
People are so accustomed to the idea of chemical rockets, the idea of using heat generated from a small nuclear reactor seems really novel.
But highly practical.
18
posted on
02/07/2023 8:57:49 AM PST
by
alloysteel
(People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do - Isaac Asimov)
To: telescope115
I know how nuclear propulsion is used on board ships and subs, but I’m wondering how it would be used in spacecraft.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Seems it’s got to eject mass in order to make thrust.
19
posted on
02/07/2023 8:57:50 AM PST
by
sonova
(That's what I always say sometimes.)
To: BenLurkin
If only some brilliant British engineer could just figure out a way to harness nuclear power to power the electrical grid!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson