Please show me where I say the vaccines are Not dangerous or without risk.
That would be very amazing and interesting.
You thrive for a vaccine debate. But you’re choosing the wrong person.
My “beef” with this Thread is the foolishness of some proclaiming every death that makes the news or local obits is Vax related.
That’s not a Vax endorsement. That’s a respect for families, decency and stop looking foolishly obsessed endorsement.
It is true that when the facts come out that someone who died young or “suddenly” wasn’t even vaccinated and/or died from known medical issues the Vax Death Group is so quiet, and not even embarrassed.
Withholding excitement from another assumed Vax death would be classy.
As I’ve said before, throughout my career as a Paramedic for Detroit Fire/EMS, sadly I’ve pumped on the chest of people of All ages and pushed drugs and defibrillated for various reasons trauma/medical.
Does lead readers of your post to conclude that you have respect & admiration for these "vaccines", and nothing but utter disdain for those who question if the death had something to do with the "vaccines".
Furthermore, you carried on about VAERS when I reference it to provide the death count it contains, accusing me of being a sucker for believing it. Of course, that was a ridiculous accusation on your part since I was arguing that we had been lied to about these "vaccines" even from the medical industry. I even pointed out that it was fraught with inaccuracy & that it was woefully underreporting adverse events, confirmed by a Harvard study, right from the beginning.
So what exactly was the point of your post , if it wasn't what, according to you now, I so grossly misinterpreted it as? Because you sure as heck offered no words of agreement when I stated that adverse events were real, numerous, and included deaths, and that it becomes a natural reaction that people question the death of someone under 10 years of age who dies suddenly, before even reading a whole article to find out the child had medical issues all along. Sadly, many articles do not even bring up those facts, so even if someone reads the article & afterwards leaves that same questioning remark, you mock those people as well.
Besides that, even if the child had existing medical issues, it still doesn't rule out that fact that the "vaccines" may have pushed the child over the edge, robbing her of who knows how many years of life.
No brother David, it was your choice to post this article that chose to be critical of those who question "vaccine" deaths and paint them as some sort of uncaring lunatic for doing so.
Just in case you are totally unaware, as you appear to be, the press has created a reputation, and rightfully so, of gaslighting the public, and people have had enough of it and are fighting back. You can either assist the the press with their gaslighting, as you did here, or you can join the people who are tired of it and are demanding honest, not biased, reporting from them.
Your choice David. I hope you choose better than you did this time.