Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alas Babylon!

The problem is that even the latest generation submarine reactors are just too big to stick on a Burke. The Zumwalts are big enough to mount one, but we only built three. And then wasted a bunch more money on the LCS.


11 posted on 01/26/2023 11:30:21 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

Flight III Arleigh Burke destroyer (DDG)

Length 509.5 ft, Beam,66 ft, displacement 9700 tons

Virginia class cruiser (CGN)

Length 585ft, Beam 63ft, displacement 9472 tons

Virginia class submarine (SSN)

Length 377 ft, beam 34ft, displacement 7800 tons

1) And the Burkes are destroyers??? LOL!

2) The Virginia class CGN were built in the 1980s.

3) I get that there are a whole lot of design differences between the two surface ship classes, but they’re of comparable size. A nuclear powered 10,000ish ton surface warship is possible. Whether it’s desirable is a separate question.

4) Virginia class subs were much smaller than Virginia class cruisers.


17 posted on 01/27/2023 6:15:10 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson