To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
There are those on FR who see self defense as an aggressive and belligerent and provocative act of war, unwarranted, and counter-productive; and those who support such self defense, warmongers. Well, that’s only if their chosen side has to face that self-defense.
So, who are the warmongers? Those who support the invader; or those who support the invaded? The question is more pertinent when the former is bigger and stronger than the latter.
16 posted on
01/24/2023 4:03:36 PM PST by
ought-six
(Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
To: ought-six
I suggest a Fleets enema for that 💨 wind.
To: ought-six
How greatly would this differ from a Mexico reclaiming Texas? Cause that’s being done right now.
27 posted on
01/24/2023 4:11:21 PM PST by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Forget "Global Warming", new grants are for "Galaxy Dimming")
To: ought-six
C. I support none of the above.
43 posted on
01/24/2023 5:00:33 PM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: ought-six; UMCRevMom@aol.com
There was a time when those who supported armed self defense were called conservatives, and those who opposed it were liberals.
That was before Russia invaded Ukraine.
76 posted on
01/24/2023 11:48:39 PM PST by
Widget Jr
(🇺🇦 Sláva UkrayÃni 🇺🇦 - No CCCP 2.0)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson