[semimojo]

A 16X greater chance of hospitalization from Covid among the unvaccinated.

Winning!

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Data from the Centers for Disease Creation and Propagation?

Seriously?

[wildcard_redneck]

Semimojo pushes the vax mandates. How does it feel to be WRONG?

[babble-on]

The study you posted literally says there’s a 16X times higher chance of being hospitalized if you have NOT been vaccinated. Hard to read when you have your head up your ass, though.

[Manuel OKelley]

Lolz ok

[Big Red Badger]

That cheered me up

[dforest]

CDC what a joke. The Center for Damage Control.

[UNGN]

A 16X greater chance of hospitalization from Covid among the unvaccinated.

Weird the CDC doesn't track natural immunity, but tries to sell bivalent boosters instead.

If Unvaccinated natural immunity was worse than vaccinated immunity, seems that would be a huge selling point for the new clot shots.

We can infer it isn't.

[ManardG]

Most ‘Vaccinated’ Japan Brought to its Knees by Covid: Most Hospitalizations and Deaths - RAIR

https://rairfoundation.com/vaccinated-japan-brought-to-its-knees-by-covid-record-hospitalizations-and-deaths/

[fr_freak]

A 16X greater chance of hospitalization from Covid among the unvaccinated.

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Mark Twain

Let me give you an example of how your CDC quote could be complete horse apples, even if their data is 100% accurate.

People who have not received any of the COVID shots and don't require hospitalization should they be infected are NOT going to be counted in this "study". Why? Because they wouldn't bother even to inform any health organizations of their status, or suspected status. They get some sniffles, they rest for a day or two, take whatever remedies they see fit, and nobody is the wiser. Their experience won't even register on any health organizations radar.

The ONLY type of "unvaccinated" person, then, who will present himself to any health organization will be, BY DEFINITION, one who requires treatment. That skews the data on a parabolic trajectory.

If there are 10,000 "unvaccinated" in a city, and 20 of those people go to a doctor because they have symptoms from COVID, and 16 are determined to need hospitalization, even if just for "observation", then the rate of hospitalization would be calculated as 16/20 or 80%, because the hospitals would have no way of knowing about the other 9,980 members of the "unvaccinated" group, which, if known, would put the hospitalization rate at 16/10,000 or .16%.

Meanwhile, the total number of "vaccinated" is known because every shot is tracked. So if there are 10,000 "vaccinated" in a city, and 700 of them go to the doctor but only 500 of them are sent to the hospital, that's a calculated rate of 500/10,000 or 5%.

Now you compare the 80% calculated rate of "unvaccinated" versus the 5% of "vaccinated" and you can say that the "unvaccinated" are 16 times more likely to be hospitalized, when the real figure is .16% vs 5%, which makes "vaccinated" 31.25 times more likely to be hospitalized than "unvaccinated".

So excuse me if I don't believe a darn thing from the CDC.

[DiogenesLamp]

The CDC? Really? I won't believe a godd@mn thing the government says anymore. You will have to get a real source that has some credibility and objectivity.

The corrupt portion of the Government is in bed with Pfizer and company.