1 posted on
01/19/2023 12:59:52 PM PST by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; JosephW; martin_fierro; Still Thinking; zeugma; Vinnie; ironman; Egon; raybbr; AFreeBird; ...
2 posted on
01/19/2023 1:00:55 PM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
To: ShadowAce
Will this mean faster pr0n?................
3 posted on
01/19/2023 1:01:23 PM PST by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: ShadowAce
“atom-thick transistors”
Still not technically 2D. And if scientists aren’t going to be technically correct, then who will???
5 posted on
01/19/2023 1:06:42 PM PST by
Boogieman
To: ShadowAce
Layer by layer. Wouldn’t that be 3D?
6 posted on
01/19/2023 1:11:24 PM PST by
bk1000
(Banned from Breitbart)
To: ShadowAce
Very interesting. Thanks for posting.
—OGINJ
To: ShadowAce
Uh, no such thing is possible. 2D is a mathematical abstraction--an x axis, a y axis. Anything in the real world has to be 3D, and have a Z axis. It can be very very thin, but no way it can be 2D in reality.
11 posted on
01/19/2023 2:15:00 PM PST by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: ShadowAce
“…developing processors with over a trillion transistors, by 2030.…”
Heat the house with that baby.
12 posted on
01/19/2023 2:22:56 PM PST by
TalBlack
(We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
To: ShadowAce
It means stronger AI, more advanced weapons of mass destruction, More memory to store the lives of every individual on earth, and much easier control of them.
15 posted on
01/19/2023 2:51:33 PM PST by
Revel
To: ShadowAce
19 posted on
01/19/2023 3:16:21 PM PST by
AdmSmith
(GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
To: ShadowAce
Anyone else here object to the “2D” designation?
I don’t care if it’s only 1 micron thick, that’s STILL 3D.
It might be less! But there’s still a quantifiable thickness to it, and as such, 3D.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson