Can you still say groomers?
Groomers are now protected by the Biden administration, as a protected class. I never in all my days believed we would live in a world where the WH protects and promotes child molesters
"Biden Education Department [??? emphasis added] Launches Civil Rights Investigation into School Book Bans"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Regarding the constitutionally undefined Education Department, why aren't federal and state MAGA Republicans pointing out the following?
President Thomas Jefferson, in a State of the Union address, also Justice Joseph Story, had both indicated that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate schooling.
“The great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers [emphasis added].” —Thomas Jefferson: 6th Annual Message, 1806." (Jefferson is indicating that Congress cannot tax and spend in the name of intrastate infrastructure imo.)
"The power to regulate manufactures is no more confided to congress, than the power to interfere with the systems of education, the poor laws, or the road laws of the states [emphasis added]." —Justice Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 2, 1833.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
With all due respect to Freeper parents, if parents were making sure that their public and private schools were reinforcing what parents are teaching their children about the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as clarified by Jefferson and Story, then school children would be able to remind their parents concerning unconstitutional Biden ED bullying.
Any so-called “federal” funding that the corrupt federal government may threaten schools with the loss of for banning activist books is arguably state revenues that should never have left the state in the first place.
More specifically, the very corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds steal state revenues by means of unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that Congress cannot reasonably justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Getting back to MAGA Republicans, what lawmakers also need to do is to help "street-fighter" Trump 47 finish draining the swamp by doing the following.
Regarding state revenues stolen by the feds, what MAGA-controlled House desparately needs to introduce a resolution for Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution to the states that is strictly limited to repealing the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th Amendments (popular voting for federal senators) (16&17A), little or ideally no discussion required for such an amendment imo.
Repealing 16&17A would effectively "secede" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government imo.
Although such a resolution is doomed with gridlocked Congress (where are the states?), what patriots initially get out of a repeal 16&17A resolution is seeing more masks fall off remaining RINO lawmakers who vote against the resolution that patriots can primary in 2024.