It’s fine...but suppose one child needs help...she needs a clause to take care of unforeseen circumstances. Suppose one of their children gets cancer...and they need money for doctor bills....or just to get through tough times. Any parent would step in and help. That’s what parents do...no matter how old a child is...or just because they don’t have a substantial income.
One sort of hopes she’s being slightly deceptive. So long as they believe her words it has the same effect, and their lives will mostly have been lived when she passes away.
I wonder if she is helpful to them while she’s still alive.
She’s right as far as it goes, but in the end isn’t her approach a form of communism? If every family didn’t or couldn’t pass on their wealth?