Posted on 01/14/2023 4:49:50 AM PST by fluorescence
Prince Harry has demanded the Royal Family apologise to Meghan Markle after he made a series of explosive claims in his new book, claiming his family were treating him as if he were 'delusional and paranoid'.
The prince said: 'You know what you did, and I now know why you did it. And you've been caught out, so just come clean.'
It is not clear what Harry wants his family to apologise to his wife for but he claimed he was fighting the 'good fight' by siding with Meghan.
He claimed that 'if people had listened' to his concerns earlier, the gulf between he and Meghan and the rest of the royals would not have grown so wide.
In an interview with The Telegraph before the official launch of his book earlier this week, Harry appeared to blame his family for the feud.
He said: 'It was all so avoidable. But they just couldn't help themselves.'
The Duke of Sussex added that he could not understand why it seemed 'shocking and outrageous' for him to tell what he said was the 'truthful' side of the story.
Harry also claimed he felt a 'responsibility' to reform the monarchy in the interests of his two young children.
He also described how therapy had helped him, but said he was unable to 'get through' to his family to agree with him.
He said: 'That’s when I started trying to explain to them how some of their decisions and some of the things they were doing - or not doing - was going to reflect on them. Badly. Especially across the global stage, especially across the Commonwealth, with relation to my now wife. And I couldn’t get through to them.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
We’re sorry the Queen wimped out and let you marry our Prince. It was because she wouldn’t let her sister marry a divorced guy, and then Margaret became a degenerate. But the Queen still shouldn’t have let you marry Harry. We’re sorry.
Marble’s father and brother warned Hairy about MeAgain. He’s the one who needs to apologize to his family.
I think the fact that Margaret became a degenerate after the Queen didn't allow her to marry a divorced guy (or whatever was the reason) was why the Queen hesitated to tell Harry "no." That, and there would have been world-wide tabloids screaming racism.
The post said nothing about Harry. But Meghan lacks the mental fortitude to be a royal because they are outward-facing servants of the kingdom, and their work is role-modeling domestically and diplomacy internationally, which requires a lot of study, discipline and self-sacrifice. They accept that there are codes of conduct and codes of honor which they should make the effort to uphold.
Meghan is like the military wives who fall in love with the image of a manly man in uniform, but then cheat on him, drink and party while he is deployed, and rake him over for "leaving her alone for so long"—as if they had no clue what they were signing up for.
That meme is hilarious!!! Here's another:
(It's a takeoff on the 11th century Bayeaux Tapestry)
And I must give credit where it is due -- Doria behaved and dressed impeccably. Not one bad move, as far as what we saw on the air. That pastor, on the other hand...
It didn’t post on my computer can you see it?
It's my understanding from reading the Brit papers that it's the policy of the Royal Family never to answer back to these sorts of attacks. Much of the Brit public thinks Harry and Meghan are especially crass for taking advantage of this tradition, knowing the relatives they are attacking are constrained from saying anything in their own defense.
So where was she when Meghan was growing up? Her father and his family raised her. Felons know how and when to dress up for the parole board.
Modern royalty in the UK is not about personal superiority, but about obligations to serve with skill and professionalism. It is a high military, civilian and ecclesiastical honorary rank, in which they are role models.
People who feel offended by their position shluld walk a mile in their shoes, never having a moment when they are not being judged by everyone in their realm, and in the UK's case, by many around the world. They are among the most important curators of the history of Western Civ; their life is decided for them. They either ride their horse or get dragged behind it, like the sniveling Harry.
Meghans nothing but a social climber who has always wanted to be seen in elite social circles.....nobody even knew who she was and nobody in the US watched her show....so she ditched her then husband to seek higher....in comes someone dumber than her...Prince Harry who she could manipulate and control to her liking.
Make no mistake Meghan will walk away from Harry....she even said no matter what happens in their marriage her son will always b a royal...and tie her to the Monarchy.
She hit pay dirt....titles, wealth an social circles.....though it's questionable how long either of them will be welcomed after all this.
Yes, and I reposted in it my reply. Computers are so weird...
It was long before that. A few weeks after Elizabeth secured her title she got a law passed to make sure her younger sister could never take her place as queen. This royal family is not for sissies.
I have an Apple and for some reason photos on FR posted by others don’t always show on mine.
Doria could have worn a full African get-up and outrageous dreads to the wedding, like that British-born black woman who recently wore such a look-at-me outfit to a royal tea reception and got a Lady-in-Waiting fired for innocently asking what part of Africa she was from; and Doria could have exuded all kinds of attitude to make the wypeepo feel very uncomfortable—but she didn't. Her outfit and manners were tasteful, better than Oprah's. Like I said, credit where it is due.
So did Diana. It didn't turn out well.
Doria was a felon and was out of Meghan’s life for over 10 years. She keeps a low profile so people won’t scrutinize her past. The royals were very kind to her. They all had to know her past but treated her respectfully.
Meghan was just using her mother as her “see I am half black card”. It was her father’s side that raised her.
What a pain for the British and the Royal Family. This deranged Harry-Meghan combo is the gift that keeps on giving.
I couldn’t find a reference in support of your assertion, and if you have one, I’d enjoy learning more about Elizabeth preventing Margaret’s ascension to the throne.
The story linked below is very diplomatic, but it sounds like Margaret was raised to be a spoiled darling and her hell-raising was along the lines of how Andrew and Harry have lowered the tone for the whole family. The Townsend affair was going on during the period you mentioned; so maybe that was one of Elizabeth’s reasons for wanting to prevent a divorced man from becoming Prince Consort, in the event she predeceased Margaret.
However, Elizabeth already had two children when she was crowned, and Charles would have been King, with a Regent appointed for him until he would be old enough to reign.
https://www.biography.com/news/queen-elizabeth-ii-princess-margaret-differences
I’m on apple, also. Strange. Must be something about your internet provider.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.