grey_whiskers wrote: “Your ship continues to sink.”
You’ve been spending too much time with Q.
...quoth the NPC.
Tell your handlers your canned ripostes are outdated.
They need to open up rehab centers for people addicted to the COVID narrative.— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) January 14, 2023
No link between COVID-19 the disease in an unvaccinated population and either myocarditis or pericarditis. Over 200,000 people in the study group.https://t.co/7F8JUJW6PJ— Stephanie Seneff (@stephanieseneff) January 14, 2023
Key points:
The evidence
Before Jonathan accepted my bet, I pointed out that:
In a study (not yet published) of 177 people in Puerto Rico (97% of whom were vaccinated), cardiac injury was objectively measured in 70% of the people measured (ages 8 to 84). I know the guy who did the study and we have all the records from the machine for each person. This is going to be hard for Jonathan to dispute. Really hard. But hey, if he can show me a study I’m wrong, it’s worth the $50K. So far, nobody else has.
In the US military, they did a thorough investigation of a large number of soldiers and found markers of cardiac injury in 68% of our soldiers. This was kept under wraps, but I am friends with the doctor who did the study.
The Thailand study is well known. It showed close to a 30% rate of cardiac injury in young adults. So that’s the backup plan. But the 70% rate of cardiac injury in Puerto Rico… that’s the slam dunk.
In addition I found this:
Changes of ECG parameters after BNT162b2 vaccine in the senior high school students in which 17.1% had at least one cardiac symptom 2-3 days after the second dose. This is only measuring ECG alone which is not very sensitive for measuring cardiac injury. So even if you believe this, it’s a good bet that more sensitive tests increase those numbers significantly.
So you cannot accuse me of being a grifter; I put my cards on the table and he just thought I was making this stuff up out of thin air.