To: grey_whiskers
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/10/2023 Vol.445, Q Day 1901, grey_whiskers wrote: |
The internal link *does* go to congress.gov with the progress of the bill including being signed into law. |
Okay but they've been calling this a 'vaccine' not a drug or medical device, at least until now. And they had ample evidence from the trials that the testing poses greater than minimal risk.....
430 posted on
01/11/2023 11:14:30 PM PST by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
Okay but they've been calling this a 'vaccine' not a drug or medical device, at least until now. And they had ample evidence from the trials that the testing poses greater than minimal risk..... Fair 'nuff.
504 posted on
01/12/2023 9:06:32 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
( (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.))
To: ransomnote
if it is “clinnical testing”, there is minimal history... how would anyone know before the fact “if the testing poses no more than minimal risk to the subjects and includes safeguards” ?
602 posted on
01/12/2023 2:00:39 PM PST by
stylin19a
(a principle to keep a person in everlasting ignorance ? - contempt prior to investigation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson