Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/04/2023 2:22:14 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: nickcarraway

The point is they don’t want to feed 10 billion people in 2050.


2 posted on 01/04/2023 2:24:07 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

1. No carbon use
2. No nitrogen use
3. No oxygen use

After they are done banning those, they can go for silicon, aluminum and iron.


3 posted on 01/04/2023 2:24:08 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (If you're not part of the solution, you're just scumming up the bottom of the beake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

more stupid science on display.


4 posted on 01/04/2023 2:24:11 PM PST by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Nitrogen is an element that makes up 78% of air. It’s not a pollutant. I know that’s not what they meant but it’s what they said.

They have demonized carbon and nitrates. What next?


6 posted on 01/04/2023 2:29:09 PM PST by I want the USA back (News media not worth camel spit. My pronouns: Haha, heehee, hoho. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Propaganda straight out of Beijing. Chemical fertilizer bad!


7 posted on 01/04/2023 2:29:43 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Calling BS on this “science”.


8 posted on 01/04/2023 2:30:41 PM PST by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Nitrogen is 78% of the composition of the atmosphere. There is no way that humans can change that to the extent that it would affect the climate.


9 posted on 01/04/2023 2:31:08 PM PST by farmguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
It's a war on nutrients.
For plants, then livestock and ultimately to make humans starve in large numbers.
Communists have used mass starvation a a weapon many times before.
It has absolutely nothing to do with the climate, that is just an excuse.

11 posted on 01/04/2023 2:34:22 PM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“nitrogen pollution”

In a planet where the atmosphere is about 4/5s nitrogen, this sounds like a phrase an insane person would come up with.


12 posted on 01/04/2023 2:34:42 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Look like we need to figure out how to get rid of the atmosphere.


13 posted on 01/04/2023 2:35:04 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

” Reducing Nitrogen Use Key to Human and Planetary Health: Study”
Of cour$e the probable re$ult of thi$ $tudy is more $tudie$ are needed.


14 posted on 01/04/2023 2:35:19 PM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

According to ‘scientists’, everything on earth and in the atmosphere is destroying the earth and atmosphere.

I guess the only hope is to create a giant ‘black hole’ and destroy the entire Earth and its atmosphere.

“We had to destroy the Earth to save the Earth.”


17 posted on 01/04/2023 2:40:02 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Climate Catastrophists are already doing more economic and social damage than actual climate change (if indeed there is any) can ever do in the next 500 years. But that's a feature, not a bug.

Never forget that the whole "CO2 global warming" scam was invented by the neo-malthusian Club of Rome as a tool to force a drastic die-off of human populations. This is only the beginning. Ultimately, YOU are the carbon they want to reduce.

Meanwhile, trust the climate oligarchs to find private profit in public policy.

18 posted on 01/04/2023 2:43:03 PM PST by Chad C. Mulligan (CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

With all that excess carbon and nitrogen - we can make nitroglycerine


19 posted on 01/04/2023 2:44:20 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

What’s next? NaCl?


21 posted on 01/04/2023 2:48:35 PM PST by ConservativeInPA (Stupidly is a moral problem, not an intellectual problem. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Already happening with California agriculture

Ag Order 4.0 was jus implemented

below is the nitrogen formula that California farmers must adhere to for nitrogen application:

Ag Order 4.0 Finalized: Implications for Nitrogen Management of Vegetables on the Central Coast

On April 15th, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB) finalized and approved Ag Order 4.0. The new rulings affect several aspects of agricultural production such as buffer areas and discharge of pesticides to water ways. In this article we will focus on the impacts of Ag Order 4.0 on the use of nitrogen (N) fertilizers.

New targets and limits on the use of N fertilizer are calculated using the A minus R metric. In this scenario, “A” is N applied to the crop in the form of fertilizer (Afertilizer), N in irrigation water (Airrigation), N supplied by compost (Acompost) and N mineralized from organic fertilizer (Aorganic fertilizer). “R” is N removed from the field by the crop (Rharvest), scavenged during the winter fallow by cover crops or immobilized by high-carbon compost (Rscavenge), N removed by denitrification bioreactors (Rtreated), N sequestered in woody plant biomass (Rsequestered), or other unspecified forms of N removal from fields (Rother). A - R is not to exceed the targets or limits shown in Table 1. The A-R is calculated over the growing season on a land acre basis. If two or more crops are grown on the same physical acre, each crop contributes to the value for the year.

Can you picture mom and pop family farmer siting around the dinner table at night trying to figure this out.


22 posted on 01/04/2023 2:51:12 PM PST by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Here we go, just as predicted.


23 posted on 01/04/2023 2:51:19 PM PST by VTenigma (Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

First they came for your CO2, then they came for your nitrogen, finally they’ll come for your oxygen ...


24 posted on 01/04/2023 3:00:06 PM PST by catnipman (In a post-covid world, ALL "science" is now political science: stolen elections have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

We would be better off by reducing the megalomaniacs.


25 posted on 01/04/2023 3:19:13 PM PST by Dutch Boy (The only thing worse than having something taken from you is to have it returned broken. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I call “BS” on this particular “New Green Deal” scam!


26 posted on 01/04/2023 3:20:10 PM PST by Taxman (SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2023 AND 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson