Posted on 01/03/2023 6:30:34 AM PST by dynachrome
In a court filing, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried asked to redact the names of the co-signers to his $250 million bail. The filing said the U.S. government has not taken a position on the request and that it's being done to protect the privacy and safety of the sureties. The filing said the two remaining sureties have yet to sign their individual bonds, the amounts of which have not yet been determined, but plan to do so by the Thursday deadline. "In recent weeks, Mr. Bankman-Fried's parents have become the target of intense media scrutiny, harassment, and threats. Among other things, Mr. Bankman-Fried's parents have received a steady stream of threatening correspondence, including communications expressing a desire that they suffer physical harm. Consequently, there is serious cause for concern that the two additional sureties would face similar intrusions on their privacy as well as threats and harassment if their names appear unredacted on their bonds or their identities are otherwise publicly disclosed," says the filing to U.S. District Court Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Gyorgy Schwartz…
They got the case moved to an Democrat Judge, as is always done when politicians are involved.
I think he would just arrange for SBF to have an accident.
Anybody that can put up millions for his bail is surely suspect. More than likely trying to cover up their own felonies.
Probably the usual scumbags.
Ummm.... no.
Unless, we are going to have a repeat of Ghislane’s being found guilty for exposing criminals that are still secret.
In this banana republic?
Let’s go big.. and outrageous..
Zelensky, Biden’s Maytag Man
Soros
Comes with membership in the BAR association (British Accreditation Regency). Attorneys, the bane of the political fabric today.
Why don’t Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell want their names published?
Make no mistake: SBF was SET FREE on a ZETO CASH BAIL. He did not put up ONE PENNY. Instead, his parents put up the equity in their house, perhaps, $1 million, as the bond, and the Feds ACCEPTED IT. It was a sweet-heart deal! Why don’t the Jan 6th protesters get similar deals?
Matching image.
“”In recent weeks, Mr. Bankman-Fried’s parents have become the target of intense media scrutiny, harassment, and threats. Among other things, Mr. Bankman-Fried’s parents have received a steady stream of threatening correspondence, including communications expressing a desire that they suffer physical harm.”
All that with no proof of course
:)
I don’t feel a damn bit sorry for any of these scumbags. I don’t think anyone threatened these scam artists either.
Keep little Sammy in the pokey where he will be safe . Right?
Why is this even possible? Judge's should be assigned at random and that should be the end of it. Don't like the judge? Tough cookies.
Lawyers are officers of the court. They can't lie.
“More than likely trying to cover up their own felonies.”
In this case, the judge is giving SBF a sweetheart deal, with a full reach-around. A true $250,000,000.00 bond would requires a cash deposit of $25,000,000.
Here’s where the reach-around comes into play, the judge accepted property as collateral. What property you might ask? We;;. $125,000.000 in property that was purchased for SBF’s parents, by SBF!
So it appears, fraudulent land purchases and gifts to his parents, funded by apparent fraud, are used as collateral to keep SBF out of jail while he awaits his ‘trial’ for fraud and embezzlement.
Pretty effing cute really.
Too bad he didn’t walk past the Capitol on J6-2021, he’d still be in the hole and due for his next rubber hose treatment!
“Why is this even possible? Judge’s should be assigned at random and that should be the end of it.”
It should be and it was. But our now-dual justice system permits political prosecutions to be handled by DNC judges.
Poor baby.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.